yes still keep raw and smackdown but combine the teo again. thats more action and the storylines will get deeper than ever be4. having to wrestle twice a week instead of just once. the chance to see matches and wrestlers square off against one another that cant happen because of the two brands. and i try and watch smackdown but it fails in comperision to raw.
2006-12-09 18:54:51 · 9 answers · asked by buddy_z34 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
YES! I've hated it since they first did it! I liked watching twice, well really three times, a week because Sunday Night Heat used to be good too. I used to watch RAW and then look forward to Thursdays so much. I also liked Smackdown better on Thursday nights, but I'd settle for Fridays if they would go back to the way it used to be!
2006-12-10 04:27:54 · answer #1 · answered by Lime745 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my personal opinion, no. More brands allows more wrestlers to claw up the ranks. If everyone went back to one brand, there'd be less TV time for everyone, and a host of wrestlers would be let go. Storylines would move along at a much faster rate (one show a week vs. 2 or 3 to feature the same angles). And WWE would lose it's "ladder" system, which is working very well right now. I'm sure they won't admit it, but RAW is clearly their main event show, Smackdown! is one rung down, then ECW, then their farm leagues. If you ask me, WWE appears to be evolving toward a revival of the old NWA territory system. Think about it. If they continue, they'll expand to create other "brands," with each brand having it's own champion. Once enough are established, they'll create another title that will be above the championships of each brand, that only the heavyweight champions of each brand can vie for. Sound familiar? Put simply, the brand extension isn't going to go away, nor should it. It's good for the company.
2016-05-23 01:33:51 · answer #2 · answered by Clarissa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they put the right people on each show it would be a lot better. Keep the new talent and old legends on smackdown. Keep the peak superstars on Raw. Each show would have a unique style which would have its place.
2006-12-09 19:27:20 · answer #3 · answered by Pzee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess that would be a better idea so we'd know the best of the best. Right now we cant see a raw superstar compete with a smackdown superstar unless its a special match.
2006-12-09 19:02:59 · answer #4 · answered by allanbabes 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
heres a idea put all best wrestlers on 1 show and use the other show for the a minor leage in its own way then there would be more competiotion also leave one shows belt in the minor leage show and the other brands belts were the beter people are imajin all best superstars fight over a belt it could be cena vs batiata vs book vs umaga all for 1 belt
2006-12-10 01:30:31 · answer #5 · answered by THE LIL ASSASSIN 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and get rid of Smack Down wrestlers except: Undertaker, Kane and Chris Benoit.
2006-12-09 19:10:26 · answer #6 · answered by 111 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you
try and bring back the sort of thing we saw in the Attitude Era.....great action
2006-12-10 06:06:49 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are trying to be one brand.
Just look at TeamXtreme Matt is frm SD! and Jeff frm Raw
but they are reunited!Look at MNM.....and do u think why this two teams fought att December to Dismember at ECW ppv
2006-12-10 00:25:24 · answer #8 · answered by RatedR RtZmE (KFC OFC PAC) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah if they go back to just one brand they will have deeper storylines and sometimes i miss one of them and i get really mad
2006-12-09 19:04:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋