100% truth
2006-12-10 19:32:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is difficult to straightway castigate Bush and Condalezza Rice in such harsh languages.When all is said and done Iraq had once defied world opinion and attached Kuwait and made no secret about its claim over it.Despite the defeat at the hand of Bush Sr. and imposition of severe restritions Iraj had hardly toned down its belligerence. The development of secret weapons is no more an impossibility even for a tribal chief in Africa what with the leakage of the lore through Pakistan.,North Korea.While there was some overenthusism it is noteworthy that many other nations like Britain,Spain, Japan etc. had also agreed to the reading of the then situaion and actively participated in the move.In politics as also in daily affairs sometimes calculations can go wrong but from the hindsight to castigate the planner would be rank injustice. Recently it is also seen that both Bush and Rice have agreed to reassess the situatioin there and modify their actions accordingly.
2006-12-10 02:45:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Prabhakar G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Naa, Bush is a two term President still in charge of the USA. Condi is a stud and after she finishes the secretary thing her options are limitless.
2006-12-10 02:41:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am an unashamed liberal and yet crap like this makes me embarrassed about engaing in any political discourse here. Critique Bush all you want, but this type of idiotic 'questions' just brings disrespect to real dissenters who make reasoned arguments for change
2006-12-10 02:41:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Hayley 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is it the truth that you're twenty nine and living at home with mommy and daddy? Is it the truth that you attend the local junior college and are on your third major and have racked up twelve units? Is it the truth that you've never done anything in your life to actually benefit the country you disparage?
Is it the truth?
2006-12-10 02:39:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No that would be anything that you tried to think up. If you were ever paid to think then you would have to repay the money for failure to fulfill the job requirement!
2006-12-10 02:34:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Could be
2006-12-10 02:42:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋