Now I watch both of these shows. And i think it's going to be war...Tna releases a little video in their show. It's about two tna wrestlers (former wwe wrestlers: "Road dogg" and "mr. ***") who are talking trash and embarrass wwe. Not long ago wwe showed their answer. Tna will have to visit lawcourt. We saw wwe to bring somebody to court,but is it good?
Tna's tv rating is 0,9.
WWE including all 3 shows (raw,smackdown!,ecw) 8,0.
But most of real wrestling fans (not little kids) like tna more than wwe. What's your opinion?
2006-12-09 18:16:11 · 18 answers · asked by iLoveToAnswer 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Right now TNA is the best wrestling brand out there. With stars like: Angle, Styles, LAX, SAmoa Joe, Christian Cage and Sting. TNA is better. Sure wwe has the better pure wrestler's while aside from the stars I have just mentioned, Iralize that TNA's roster is made up of mostly wannabe stuntmen instead of actual wrestler's. However this past year WWE has proven that they dont give a damn about their fans, here are some of their worst of 2006:
1.Rey Mysterio wins the Royal Rumble
2.Wrestlemania 22, one of the worst ever
3. Mysterio/Guerrero storyline-disgraceful/desrespectful/the worst storyline ever.
4.ECW - with wwe controlling it really stand for extremly crappy wrestling.
5. Releasing Kurt Angle - He's only one of the greatest of all time
6. DX - We' ve already seen this before
7.ECW PPV December to DisRemeber as it was one of the worst PPV in wrestling history.
I could go on forver describing why each one sux, but instead I'll just reflect on the positive side of wwe instead which wont take long:
Cena vs. EDGE feud
King BOOKAAAAAA
Tribute to the Troops/ RAW in Iraq.
Although TNA has it's srewups I dont think they're anywhere as bad as WWE. Peresonally, I only see TNA getting better and WWE geting worse.
2006-12-09 19:07:59 · answer #1 · answered by rojojr 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ive been a wrestling fan since i was like 1 and ive watched both TNA and WWE. WWE has the best pure wrestlers in the sport but if you like high flying action that is more curiographed than a ice capades show watch TNA if you want wrestling and highflying action with a storyline and fun and an anouncing team your ganna watch WWE and well i like good quality wrestling and a good show so im on the side of WWE.
2006-12-09 18:24:07 · answer #2 · answered by silver_black_17 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
? No aspects for me. I DVR and watch the two on Mondays. I watch NXT, super Stars , and SD. I watch the PPVs. I even have loyalties to the two businesses. There are stars that I help in the two businesses, I even have watched TNA for years and WWE because of the fact it became into WWF and WCW and ECW. in the previous that I watched Georgia and Florida wrestling and AWA and NWA. If Heyman is surely coming to TNA that is going to likely be a huge advance interior the arm. WCW beat WWF for the way long interior the rankings? i think that is all politics as long as TNA has Panda's help and desires to attempt replace and advance on no account say on no account. WWE has a fan base which contains human beings not the right age to appreciate something yet WWE because it is so the rankings will proceed to replicate this in the intervening time.
2016-10-18 01:25:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm with WWE because TNA is made up of WWE Superstars.........but i think WWE should be interbranded once again and they will be ready for the war.
WWE have done won the MONDAY NIGHT WARS against WCW..
and once again WWE will win the war...and have the storyline with the TNA wrestlers by 2008
WWE vs TNA
2006-12-10 00:14:55 · answer #4 · answered by RatedR RtZmE (KFC OFC PAC) 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Has anybody ever seen RoH? Anybody? No? Fine...
I'll state that TNA stands up to its name and its got a majoritory of WWF Wrestlers from the 'Attitude' days... But WWE is still Entertaining to watch. 5 hours of fun every week is pretty cool. With Guys like Batista and the Hardys and even childhood favorites like Taker and Flair,too.. but if you want to have that notsalgic feeling of Wrestling entertainment, Go to TNA...
My vote goes to WWE!
2006-12-09 19:59:03 · answer #5 · answered by Napalm E 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
real wrestling fans appreciate wwe no matter what and posers like TNA. Don't get me wrong TNA is good but its filled with former WWE stars that aren't good enough anymore to wrestle in the WWE brand
2006-12-09 18:26:59 · answer #6 · answered by Matthew Shlmn 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In fact,I like WWE than TNA.But TNA is more real than WWE,if let me choose,I might stand by WWE's side,after all,the history of WWE is longer than TNA.
2006-12-09 18:24:05 · answer #7 · answered by Paul 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is bringing TNA to court?!?! I'll be on WWE's side.TNA ratings is still be low 1.0!!! I thought they surpassed it with Kurt Angle!! TNA fans and WWE fans are real PROFESSIONAL wrestling fans.The only real wrestling fans is those amatuer and olympic wrestling fans.WWE will most likely to win the court case.
2006-12-09 19:54:27 · answer #8 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All I have to say is that, WWE is better and TNA will never be like them.
2006-12-09 19:21:02 · answer #9 · answered by 111 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
TNA is not real wrestling, real wrestling is wrestling! Like the one you see in Olympics.
WWE all the way
2006-12-09 18:38:28 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋