We have proof that Flight 92 never crashed in Pennsylvania,
We have proof that the heat generated by the fuel from the jets striking the Twin Towers could not have caused the whole building to collapse.
We know that all but a few jets were sent to other areas on 9 11.
2006-12-09 18:01:39 · 17 answers · asked by Jim Later 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Sorta like asking a murderer to investigate whether he commited a crime.
2006-12-09 19:00:56 · answer #1 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The people who did the inside job of the twin towers are also prolly the people who made everything taste like chicken! Come on get real, there isnt always a controversy going on, 99.9% of the time, what really happend is the simplist and most obvious thing. Flight 93 did crash in Pennsylvania, the twins towers collapsing was not soley caused by heat! Explosions of things such as airplanes dont destroy with heat, they destroy with creating powerful waves that move through the air and tear everything in their paths to shreds. Forgive me if im wrong, but I think you need to add Physics to your list classes. What are you talking about that all but a few planes were sent to other areas, the only places I can think of is the runways of airports.
2006-12-09 18:09:14 · answer #2 · answered by Bob W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If all you can do is spout the lies of Micheal Moore then please go somewhere else.
The March 2003 edition of Popular Mechanic did a report on the lies you just spouted and proved that the plane did crash in Pennsylvania, the two planes did take down the twin towers and a plane did fly into the Pentagon!
2006-12-09 18:23:21 · answer #3 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only people claiming 9/11 was an inside job are fundamentalist Muslims such as yourself who are trying to fix their image.
They decided that deflecting their guilt and blaming the U.S and Israel for 9/11 will distract the world from the truth; that Osama and his cronies took credit for 9/11 and promised more attacks on the West.
2006-12-09 18:53:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If there is proof, I haven't seen it. The most plausible explanation is still the government's stated version of the events. Why do I get the strangest feeling that this is going to turn into JFK's death part 2?
thanks for the 2 points, though.
2006-12-09 18:11:12 · answer #5 · answered by Keiron 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1) it was Flight 93 and there is proof it did crash there. they found 100's of body parts and identified them through dna
2) you forget that 2 gian commercial airplanes also crashed into those buildigns, and no one is claimign that fire alone brought down the buildings. it was a combination of factors, includign fire, two planes, and this little thing CALLED gravity
3) whta jets? that day, no one knew what was going on
seriously , please join us in 2006. Those 2002 conspiracy theories have long been debunked.
2006-12-09 20:30:25 · answer #6 · answered by arus.geo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there was 100% proof of ya'lls outlandish fiction, it would out for everyone to see. Billboards, newspapers, leaflets dropped from planes, and yes, from the mouths of mimes.
Shut yer friggin mouth, ya ignorant piece of elephant dung.
(all due apologies to elephant dung)
2006-12-09 18:13:09 · answer #7 · answered by unclewill67 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey, I bet you believed Alien Autopsy was real too, didn't you? You 9-11 conspiracy people would be funny if it wasn't so sad. Surely you don't believe all that crapola.
2006-12-10 05:21:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see a lot of wasted imagination and thought in this question.
2006-12-09 18:04:03 · answer #9 · answered by I like Chinese food 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We know that you are goofy. I suppose Oswald flew one of the planes for us.
2006-12-09 18:10:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋