the oceans... rivers .. and streams ... and showing it worldwide when big businesses and America. England, Europe and Australia (THE WORST CULPRITS)are doing a better job of it.. ITS SO HYPOCRYTICAL AND LETS OUT EMOTION OF ANGER AND HATRED AT THE HYPOCRYCSY. They even have the cheek to blame the locals...huh!!
2006-12-09 17:32:41 · 3 answers · asked by Saddam 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
BBC must be equal in the treatment of nations big or small in projecting who are the real pollutants in this world.
2006-12-09 17:36:44 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe due to the fact in the event that they blame the locals who cannot damage the BBC it is more secure then blaming tremendous businesses who purchase promoting on BBC? In the top, it is constantly approximately cash, they do not care approximately humans, the humans are chumps and nod their heads while the TV tells them to.
2016-09-03 09:10:36 · answer #2 · answered by rentschler 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't it be nice if some of the money was donated to charitable organizations that could assist with the problem?
However, don't fear that the BBC is loosing money. The profits they take from PBS and Discovery are enough to cover expenses.
Please note my sarcasm.
2006-12-09 17:43:43 · answer #3 · answered by blewz4u 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋