when it comes to 'make me feel better' pills
so to speak ...
i don't because as for all this being a scientific thing ... neurochemistry is a very inexact and young addition to the bastions of science. And they really ain't no clue on the variables they are dealing with so how can they be so sure?
And the fact that it works for the majority is no solace to me. I'm much more bothered by the fact they ain't even asking why an amphetamine-like substance should calm over-active kids down.
"The body bears the burden" ... and no drug is gonna change that.
What you think?
2006-12-09
16:09:20
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Part Time Cynic
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
demnity ... in all my seriousness i did forget about some of the side-effects. Bless them he? :-)
2006-12-09
16:19:15 ·
update #1
demnity: Had to dig but you should get out of the sun i reckon ...There are lots of neurochemicals, and the ones you're interested in are called neurotransmitters...
Part of a best answer to one of my previous questions.
We're still unravelling the signalling systems and such of the brain, and the more we learn, the more complex it gets.
The big thing you have to realize is that the most recent data indicates that it is highly probably that the brain's chemistry is what is called (mathematically) deterministic chaos. What that means is that any single small step is totally describable, and its immediate outcome is totally predictable, but when you expand to dozens or hundreds of steps, across large areas of involvement, it gets 'way out of hand, and the error of the estimate becomes larger than the estimate. How environmental influences affect this is really tough to analyze, given the massive complexity and the incompleteness of our data.
2006-12-09
16:26:40 ·
update #2
This was the question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aty66yfby7o225RGeasppvwgBgx.?qid=1006041026762
2006-12-09
16:27:06 ·
update #3