which wrestling company is better TNA or WWE?

Answer 1

currently the wwe is the better company ratings wise but wrestling wise tna is better

over the last 4 years the company that has gotten better is tna. 4 years ago they had weekly PPV shows and their biggest wrestlers were jarret and ron killings, but now tna is on primetime, they now have guys like kurt angle and sting on their roster.

WWE on the other hand was a billion dollar company with 2 weekly shows (3 if you count heat) and guys like the rock, triple h, undertaker, hogan, jericho, benoit, ange and many more.

people criticize tna because it's ratings are 0.9 but compare that to what they had only two years ago (0.2) and you will see that tna is getting better and at the rate it's growing it will be at the same level as WWE if wwe does not do something

Raws rating has been in the low 4.0-low-3.0 since 2002 but compared to 1999 when they once had and 8.1 rating the they have gone down a lot. Smackdowns rating this week was 2.7; in 1999 heat once got a 6.6 rating, and if things don't change soon WWE could once again be 2nd best.

so don't tell me that TNA is not as good a wrestling company as the wwe cause it doesn't have good rating or it does'nt have the biggest superstars. i'm going to wait a couple years before i decide which company is better

Answer 2

Ring of honor

Chikara

Both these company's put on better matches with more great spots than the soap opera that is the WWE.

Saying all that TNA really is the best televised wrestling show on TV today.

WWE had its day in the sun I don't think they will regain older viewers again.

ECW is just a shadow of its former self.

But all of you should support the INDYS they are were its at

Answer 3

In terms of storyline, management, play by play announcers, and general sports entertainment, WWE for the win.
But if we take into consideration of how athletic TNA's wrestlers are, especially in the X division, and just pure wrestling, it's TNA all the way. Just watch a Senshi vs. Chris Sabin match.
Of course here's a thought. The wrestlers WWE released (Christian(Cage), Rhyno, Tyson Tomko) are impact players there, while 2nd rate in WWE. WWE just has a deeper roster.

Answer 4

TNA has got the better talent,storylines and action
WWE is just a joke now with losers like Cena and Batista as the main guys.The first time i watched TNA i was amazed and ever since then I've been watching TNA while WWE's ratings have gone down dramatically and they lose money while TNA is gaining it.

Answer 5

WWE has more talented people, but between Raw/Smackdown/ECW they have spread their talent too thin and end up pushing some people into roles they really don't have a place in. They have also, in effect, ruined the tag team division for their company.

TNA has a much smaller, but better utilized, roster. I do feel TNA could use some work on their Tag Team divison as well, but there is a future there.

I enjoy both brands for what they are, one for a storyline show with some good matches and one for a mat show with mild storylines.

onequesti0n

Answer 6

well heres the thing. wwe have gr8 wrestlers but there creative team consistently fail to create entertaining matches during raw, ecw, and smackdown. But they do throw up the odd amazing match at a ppv which would beat the tna/roh main event any day But on a consitent basis , tna. Fast And Furious matches there great But wwe are supeirior in every other department

Answer 7

Pure mat action TNA is way better the WWE because of the X-Division and their Tag Division. Story line and anouncer wise WWE except the storlines in WWE are becoming a little stale and they need soem new twists.

Answer 8

tna because they actually put on good wrestling shows. and tna has the x-division and the action that wwe is afraid to give to their fans.

Answer 9

Of course its wwe

Answer 10

I like WWE better. I even think that AAA is better than TNA.