Did you know the 9/11 Attacks Were Carried out by the BUSH ADMINISTRATION?

Question

Evidence Proves THERMITE cut the Main Pillars:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774&q=thermite&hl=en


A Free Video that proves it was an inside job with evidence, Recommended for Beginners:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&hl=en


Boston to gather for "911 Inside Job"Truth Rally - Boston Tea Party

http://www.boston911truth.org/teaparty/index.html


Evidence I placed in My Profile:

http://www.myspace.com/conspiracyalert
(Top Blog)


If you dont like Myspace then check out http://www.st911.org or http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html or http://www.ny911truth.org/ or if you like Relgion: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/truth_about_911.htm


Scientists Risk Lives to tell World 911 Inside Job:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403757&in_page_id=1770

Dont Listen to this Moron:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdCg6WLmxOk

Those tapes were fake.

Answer 1

1st Link - thermite is an incidiary chemical reaction that burns DOWNWARD. the most common chemicals found in thermite are the sAME chemicals you'd find in a 110 story office building. what you are showing is a video of molten metal..you know like aluminum... lots of aluminum found in two large commercial jetliners and a 110 story office building. NO big freaking surprise

2nd LInk - the fictional story called Loose Change. Dylan Avery is a drop out fillmaker who's mission was to make a film about a ficitonal character figuring out 911 was an inside job. There is nothing remotle true in Loose Change. There are over 430 errors of fact. And why is there a "2nd" version? Couldn't he have gotten it right the FIRST TIME?

3rd link - just more deluded invidiuals who dont even know there history. The boston tea party version of 911/ Then why the hell are they going to dress up as 'patriots" Dont you know that it wast the patriots who DRESSED up as MOHAWKS!??

4th link - your profile sucks and has been reported for tos violations

5th - 8th link - sorry but kook conspiracy sites run by morons are not credible sites

This guy has several personalities/id's on Yahoo! Answers. To spam his myspace account (which has already been reported to them) Report him to Yahoo! for Abuse. He always uses the urls of known conspiracy/kook sites as his nickname here:

Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.prisonplanet.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.loosechange911.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.infowars.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.st911.org
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: 911blogger.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: ght657365ijytejk
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: 911sharethetruth.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.letsroll911.org
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.jonesreport.com

http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=AmqBaRAG0GXcleQqSWZHW9AnzKIX?p=www.st911.org&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=AmqBaRAG0GXcleQqSWZHW9AnzKIX?=www.infowars.com&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=AmqBaRAG0GXcleQqSWZHW9AnzKIX?p=www.loosechange911.com&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=AmqBaRAG0GXcleQqSWZHW9AnzKIX?=www.prisonplanet.com&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=At4IhODEeSG2lH5Kw76E97cnzKIX?p=911blogger.com&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=At4IhODEeSG2lH5Kw76E97cnzKIX?p=ght657365ijytejk&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=At4IhODEeSG2lH5Kw76E97cnzKIX?p=911sharethetruth.com&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=AmqBaRAG0GXcleQqSWZHW9AnzKIX?p=www.letsroll911.org&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1
http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=At4IhODEeSG2lH5Kw76E97cnzKIX?p=www.jonesreport.com&scope=nick&mc=&fltr=_en&tab=0&asktime=&st=1

Please, to get the real truth, visit these websites, where they have 1000's of facts and EVIDENCE (not a measily 30) that 9/11 was carried out by an extremist muslim group. All the links below are to CREDIBLE websites, experts, engineers, fire fighters, controlled demolitionists, and the like, who are more than qualified, and have investigated the events of 911.
Notice how most of his "links' on his myspace site are only to conspiracy sites? No expert sites? Like the ASCE?

Debunking Sites:
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.jod911.com/
http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php


Reports:
http://wtc.nist.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
http://www.9-11commission.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc-report/WTC_ch2.pdf
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/12/victim-capsule-flight77.htm
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?archiveDate=10-07-01&storyID=7299
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285.PDF
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.asce.org/responds/
http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh/1-Services/Astaneh-Testimony%20Congress-March%206%20Final.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/defense/aviationnow_jumpstart.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3919613.stm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/25/attack/main501989.shtml
http://www.designnews.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6363426&industryid=43653
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc04.pdf
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc08.pdf
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/embryriddle092101.html
http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
http://www.firehouse.com/news/2002/7/7_P911.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28318-2005Apr5.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011220shanksville1220p2.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925sledzik0925p3.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011028flt93mainstoryp7.asp
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212800,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
http://cryptome.sabotage.org/wtc-house.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A13766-2001Sep11
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/030127.asp
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040225213523/http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
http://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/techactv2005/ar2005_safety.html#fire
http://www.911myths.com/html/ntsb_release_august_22_2006.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/towers_5-1.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20031026101720/http://www.arabianews.org/english/article.cfm?qid=12&sid=6
http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/skyscrapers.pdf
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A19549-2001Sep24
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/M.A.Sweeney.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html
http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml

Answer 2

911 conspiracy theory lies too. Would you like examples?

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages.

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Answer 3

than why has bin laden bragged about it?