How did the "people" behind the 9/11 tragedy profit?

Question

I've seen multiple movies regarding 9/11 as to being an inside job. "Loose Change" on google video and various others. For something of that magnitude to take place serious profits would have to be made to justify the actions. Who recieved these profits?

Answer 1

The authors and producers who come up with stupid theories that are bought by a gullible public. If people ignored these clowns the work of truly dedicated professionals would help give us a clearer picture of what happened, something we all already know.

Answer 2

of course, that is an attempt to benefit on tragedy. Does anybody think of this may well be a public provider statement? No. that may not charity by using the community. the real question is have they have been given an time table (previous rankings) of their presentation of the information. i don't understand. Is it shameless? It comes back to their motivation interior the presentation of information. that's the version. Cindy Sheehan, Ann Coulter (who charged that few 9-11 widows have been reaping rewards from tragedy, not all), and Michael Moore definatley have an time table and that they say issues to push that time table. no person has considered course to 9-11. Does the invention Channel responsible of an attempt to benefit on a tragedy while they air a particular approximately Katrina, or a tidal wave, or regardless of. possibly and doubtless not. relies upon on their time table. that is exciting what a stir this actual is having? Democrats had not something to declare while Howard Dean accused the President of understanding the 9-11 attack became into coming. Democrats had not something to declare bearing directly to the CBS movie approximately Reagen regardless of that is errors. Liberals had not something undesirable to declare approximately Michael Moore's F9-11 (which he called a documentary in assessment to the creators needless to say to 9-11) regardless of that is errors. rely of actuality Michael Moore became into invited to take a seat down beside Jimmy Carter on the Dem. national convention. Sandy berger filled records into his wallet in the previous testimony in the previous the 9-11 fee and liberals had not something undesirable to declare. So there is an inconsitancy right here that's modern-day on the two aspects of the aisle. finally, does anybody surely have information that this became into funded by using the republicans or that the community is in contact with Republicans or that Republicans have something to do with course to 9-11?

Answer 3

No one, it wasn't an inside job. For it to have been pulled off other than as officially stated, too many people would have been involved, and someone would have spoken out, saying they were involved.

Answer 4

Michael Moore and all the other money hungry reptiles, that's who.

Answer 5

The us government but i think that they are dirtbugs just like the you know what (yahho) commany

Answer 6

visit here first, http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html

911 conspiracy theory lies too. Would you like examples?

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages.

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?