His career was nearly over in Boston and then all of a sudden he started dominating again . . .
2006-12-09 11:54:33 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
TO ME HE HAS BEEN A SUSPECT FOR YEARS. HE HAS GOTTEN BIGGER AND BETTER AS HE HAS GROW OLDER. IF THAT IS NOT A RED FLAG, I HAVE NOTHING TO SAY.
2006-12-09 12:16:21 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I see your point, but I have to say no. He is a power-pitcher with fantastic accuracy. A lethal combination. Plus, the umpires give him a few calls here and there. He is, without a doubt, a first-ballot hall of famer. I just hope he doesn't stay with the Astros so the Cubs don't have to face him as much, if at all.
2006-12-10 01:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by cubsjunkie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Steroids, probably not, but a lot of pitchers that use illegal drugs, use HGH. It helps them heal faster which they need. Getting a lot of muscle could actually hinder them.
2006-12-09 20:47:35 · answer #3 · answered by colbykaplan 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was dominating when he was in pinstripes, because his knee injury was gone. He had his best years as a Yankee and he is going to the Hall of Fame dressed in pinstripes, because he is once again coming back to us (along with Pettitte.)
2006-12-09 22:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by ViVa La inDiA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sure looks like it. He was a skinny man in Boston, now hes s muscley over tempered red neck.
2006-12-09 20:21:47 · answer #5 · answered by MikeAwesome 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he isnt dominant so he isn't using steroids. In Boston he had an ankle problem and it has healed.
2006-12-09 19:56:43 · answer #6 · answered by David B. 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that's just ridiculous! what? clemens on the juice?
who next? Bonds?
oh no!
2006-12-09 21:08:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm starting to wonder if we're not all on steroids.
2006-12-09 20:06:51 · answer #8 · answered by ROBERT L O 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Very well could be. Nothing surprises me anymore.
2006-12-10 08:31:55 · answer #9 · answered by caodancer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no but hes on some donuts or something
2006-12-09 21:12:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋