Bush says he has no plans to invade Iran. So will he invade anyway , just like he did in Iraq?

Answer 1

Mr. Bush should concentrate on his present problems in Iraq. He shoud just resign himself that he needs Iran re Iraq.
It wouldn't be such a good idea to "bomb" Iran either. Let us not forget that we have no idea who is on whose side anymore. Like the Jews support the Jews, Muslims support Muslims. It may not be that well known but that is the way it is.
And remember, we don't have much of a coalition of the willing anymore.........

Answer 2

If we see a major troop withdrawal from Iraq before Bush leaves office, then expect air strikes to follow in Iran. The US wont invade Iran, they will bomb Iran. If they choose to invade it will be a decade or more from now. The reason Bush wont bomb now, is because Iran holds the cards in Iraq to a great degree. It can ramp up support of the shiites, and it can send in more insurgents, and arms to be used against the Coalition troops. Ironically, Bush may hurry to leave Iraq, in order to be free to bomb Iran. Israel may also bomb Iran, but would need US help.

Answer 3

There won't be an invasion of Iran, although I've never heard Bush say he wouldn't invade that country. If the President of Iran will stop being a total jackass and comply with the international community, then it may be possible to assure that Iran is indeed developing a peaceful nuclear program, but if he does not; at the most we'll see air strikes on the nuclear site themselves.

Answer 4

Once Bush has(in)credible (mis)information that he can take before Congress to legitimize the invasion of Iran like he did with Iraq, you all will jump right back on his bandwagon again. And like Iraq, will flip-flop when the intelligence is wrong again, like Iraq. Sorry for sounding so cynical but since Iraq was based on faulty intelligence and you all bought into it, one cannot hold out much hope that it won't happen again with Iran. As far as the one responder that noted Kerry flip-flopping on his support for the war in Iraq. No one had reason to doubt the initial intelligence for going to war and because of that Kerry and others voted to support your Commander in Chief. Once the truth came out, then and only then did people, Kerry included, voice their opposition. Like any loyal, patriotic American should do.

Answer 5

Since he has run out of troops, no/ That is the only thing stopping him

Then again he may order an air attack against Iranian WMDs, then demand a draft to keep us from being "nuked by Iran" That lie might work.

Scary thing is, Pelosi just gave him a green light to do something just that stupid when she said she would block any move toward impeachment. Seems we may have some graft or blackmail or something going on with both sides.. Way to go, Nancy, for selling us out.

Answer 6

I think he is wayyyyyyyy below average intelligence.
I think he is a punk, a thug, dictatorial and secretive.
I think he's a smirking jerk.
\
If he invades Iran after all his failures in Iraq,
then I think he is also insane - a thought that never occurred to me before.

Answer 7

Bush didn't invade Iraq by himself. He went before Congress , laid out the information that our "intelligence services" provided.
Congress was to read the information, understand it, ask for clarification and then vote.
Congress voted to go to war in Iraq. A minor detail most people overlook in their blame game philosophy.

Remember John Kerry and his rally cry of "I voted for the war before I voted against it" flip-flop speeches or cover your behind excuses? Take your pick

Answer 8

Not if he is intelligent.