I have to Agree with you Big Dave. But not just Because she is good looking and can sing, but because most of the other acts were well erm how do we put it politely craaaaaaaaaaap. And hay who wants another male to win after all not a prob if you like Gareth Gates, Will Young, Shane Ward, pumping out you car window in the summer on a red hot day at the traffic lights with people gawping AT YOU!
2006-12-09 11:48:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gilly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you ever took precalculus or yet another math type which covers residences of purposes, you ideas to make certain the area of the function. between the purple flags to look out for is as quickly as you divide by employing employing 0. on your expression, mutually as x = 3, the denominator is 0. for that reason, the area is each and each style beside 3. regrettably, the variety you attempt to plug in (x = 3) is the only style that would not artwork in this function. to artwork out this properly-properly-known hand, you0 can graph this function on a TI-80 3. in case you zoom in on the edge of the graph at x = 3, you will see that there is a clean spot there! it extremely is employing the fact, as reported above, there merely isn't a fee of the expression at x = 3. you will in all possibility have the skill to declare, ideal it appears that evidently like the respond could desire to be 6, observing the graph. this theory of what the respond "could desire to be" is what limits are all approximately. The values of the function on the left and precise of x = 3 all bypass in direction of 6 as you grab up with and closer. So we are announcing the decrease lower back as x is going to 3 is 6. So even with the user-friendly fact that it somewhat is no longer technically the respond, 6 is your incredible determination. 0 is barely no longer incredible in any experience. the very incredible answer is to declare that the expression is undefined at x = 3. This situation illustrates why 0/0 is termed indeterminate. in this situation, 0/0 in a fashion equals 6. the theory 0/0 can equivalent some thing is absolutely the essence of calculus.
2016-12-30 05:02:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think she looks far better without make-up, she has beautiful eyes, I shall still vote for Ray though, I think Leona as got a long and fruitful career in front of her regardless of whether she wins or not.
2006-12-09 14:09:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by itsjustme 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think she's much to look at.
A more attractive Sarah Jessica Parker? maybe....but most females are more attractive than SJP.
2006-12-09 11:54:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by mainwoolly 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
She has everything I think she will be a huge success, I hope you stand a chance with her you will have to join the queue.
2006-12-09 11:43:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kirks Folley 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Personally I dont think that S.J.P. is very attractive
2006-12-10 04:40:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont throw your money away on that tripe show..... you are merely lining Simon Cowell's pockets..... and its killing the British music scene.
2006-12-09 11:44:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
I won't be voting for anyone - the winner has gone - BEN!!! He should have won it.
2006-12-09 12:11:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
She looks awful in reality! She has also been with her boyfriend for 4yrs, don't waste your precious time.
2006-12-09 11:48:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by china doll 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You obviously haven't seen her without the make-up. Its scary
2006-12-09 11:45:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by beanie 5
·
2⤊
2⤋