Let's say former President Clinton were to record a album of covers of famous rock songs, and have his various Family members play on the album (Chelsea on back up vocals, Hillary on drums, Roger on lead guitar) and they did an album covering the music of Led Zepplin, Fleetwood Mac, CCR, Aerosmith, Rod Stewart, Carole King, etc etc...
So, would some be offended that a former President would do something like that?
Would it be entertaining?
Would such an album sell well?
Would you buy it?
2006-12-09 11:12:10 · 6 answers · asked by Middy S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have no problem with the concept myself, and I personally dont think of it as disrespectful, and besides, such an album would make a bundle of money which could be directed towards charity.
I can easily see Bill doing lead vocals and the occasional sax solo. He has a Kenny Rogers quality to his voice, so perhaps he could cover "Ruby".
2006-12-10 01:18:35 · update #1
That would be awesome! I'd definitely buy it.
2006-12-09 11:18:34 · answer #1 · answered by amg503 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I'd think Clinton singing Metalica's Unforgiven II would be hilarous
2006-12-09 19:14:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Billybob Clinton and Monica Lewinsky could do a duet of "You Don't Bring Me Flowers" Like Neil Diamond and Barbra Bignose but they could call it "You Don't Give Me Hummers, Anymore"
2006-12-09 19:17:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're wasting your good energy in the wrong way. Clinton is a Statesman now. Plus, have a little respect.
2006-12-09 19:21:49 · answer #4 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey! Anything to keep Clinton busy and from hanging out around young girls, is fine with me.
2006-12-09 19:16:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm offended just thinking of that moron and his family ruining great rock songs!
2006-12-09 19:17:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋