Should we use nucular weapons against Iran?

Question

It's in our country's interests to find those who would do harm to us and get them out of harm's way.

Well, we've made the decision to defeat the terrorists abroad so we don't have to face them here at home. And when you engage the terrorists abroad, it causes activity and action.

This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table.

Answer 1

No.

Answer 2

What on earth for? Iran is perfectly entitled to have nuclear weapons. Israel has them (by the way, I'm Jewish). India has them, Pakistan has them, and has today tested a delivery vehicle.

Elements of the military of the Republic of Ireland were implicated in the supply of weaponry and military training to the IRA (though never proven), but there has never been an arms embargo or trade embargo against Eire. Their extremely capable forces use Austrian rifles, Swiss APCs and British artillery. Allegations that the IRA, operating on Eireann territory, trained Basque ETA 'terrorists' evinced not one jot or tittle of protest from Spain.

If Iran comes out and makes a Policy Statement that their Nation will assist terrorists, then Iran is deserving of international censure Until then, demonising Iran and other Islamic countries will do no good for either cause, and the US, UK, Israel and other countries should mind their own business.

Iranian ships moor weekly about 2 miles from my home. I'm not worried.

Answer 3

Military action has not solved anything so far and specially when your main decision maker is Mr Bush (who didn’t even know where India was before election). With such people in power any military action is a step closer to another world war. Iranian government are wrong but the US policy is worse and is the result of what we are seeing today. This should be resolved internationally and don’t panic because Iran needs another 9 years to acquire the technology. Only Bush is rushing because he only has until 2008 in the office.

Answer 4

No check it out--Iran was once an ally and no terrorists were from Iran--perhaps you should be reminded the 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. And least you forget the big tall guy--still missing--Bin ladin is from a prominent Saudi family. So quit holding hands with the hand that feed the terrorists

Answer 5

The question/er is so stupid it makes it almost irrelevant to answer this but what the hell...nuclear weapons dumb schmuck - b.a.d. - using them s.t.o.o.p.i.d - and yes you made the decision to wage war on terror - stop and think about that for a moment - oh yeah like the war on drugs (that really worked well for you guys) is something that actually can not be won...strangely you are now discovering your phobic and racist attacks on poorly armed nations come sback to bite you hard in the *** with yep, terrorism - nature of terroism big boy.
As for no plans to wage war on Iran - uhhhh yeah unless you listen to the US news probably Fox News who advocate it until it becomes dumb neo con policy but yep same as you planned war againt Iraq and when 9/11 kicked in a fine excuse to go grab oil and revenge pappy Bush blaming Saddam for thehandiwork of your mate Osama

Answer 6

No - "we - the world" should concentrate on finding & taking out the Mad Mullahs who are brainwashing the people of Iran into believing that the Western World is an Evil Empire.. Use the Nukes as a very last resort.. But everyone will have to realise - We cant allow Mad Mullahs to have their fingers anywhere near the button..

Answer 7

Sorry to be an America beater ( no, i'm not really !) but Bush couldn't run a tap on his own let alone a nuclear power ! Wasn't it Bush's administration that helped convince Blair and the UK about WMD's ? Were are they know we've invaded, nobody seeme bothered anymore ? What has Iran done to us yet ?

Answer 8

If you are the genuine G.W.Bush, we should all be afraid, very afraid, that you have to resort to Questions and Answers to decide the fate of the world.

Nuclear weapons should never be used, it would only be committing suicide.

If you have an argument or disagreement with the leader of another country, then get in the boxing ring with them, and decide it that way.

Then all the innocent people will not get hurt, only you!

Answer 9

dropping bombs on them will only cause them to attack us more. How do you fight religion. You can bomb an area were they live but that will only piss off the others that live in other areas and breed more hate. I think you should go over there your self and talk to the "terrorist" or what you use to call them when your dad sent our own cia there to train them "freedom fighters" you created your own bastard child and now your made when he is pissed cuz you haven't been around. Go apologize to them for leaving them after their civil war they needed and you left them go say your sorry and maybe with time they can love you again. God speed Georgie boy God speed.

Answer 10

Let's think about this......

(1) You would kill thousands of innocent people.
(2) You would make the area uninhabitable for many years.
(3) You would release nuclear radiation into the atmosphere, which would float around & affect other countries.
(4) You would piss off all the other countries in the region.
(5) You would piss off most of the other countries in the world.

I don't think it would be a great idea.

Answer 11

Ha ha ha ha ha love your avatar and user name.

I doubt if George W Bush actually knows where Iran is, let alone what to do about Iran.

I am just grateful that in the not too distant future we will see another president and the world should become a safer place for all of us after that.