http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM
QUESTION: do you understand this clip ? and do you actually care about the ramifacations of this ? or will you only care untill it ends up on your door step ?
negative answers welcome explain this away it will be funny.
also i you think this is some sort of anti american thing dont fool your self.
2006-12-09 07:29:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
the point is only 3 steel frame buildings in history have fallen because of fire ? see got the zombie answers ,but like i said welcome for thumbs down.
2006-12-09 07:42:00 · update #1
hearts: its in plain view lol how is it a conspiracy thoery,couldnt make it any simpler ,nice one zombie.
2006-12-09 07:48:15 · update #2
Whats that quote about lying to the masses ,i can`t remember it now but it`s something about making it so big a lie that a normal person would find it impossible to think it couldn`t be true .but i think the American people have been fed so many whoppers over time it`s impossible to separate the truth from the lies .I have always thought it dodgy from when TV showed the Bin Laden family being hurriedly jetted back to Saudi while all other commercial flights were still grounded .But then i`m not an American.
2006-12-09 13:10:05 · answer #1 · answered by keny 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can you verify with any credible source that the buildings were constructed using the exact same design? No, because they were not. The only thing the two have in common is the choice of steel framing. How many steel joists were used, the thickness of the metal and the actual design of the buildings architecturally are vastly different. Apples and oranges man. There is real stuff in the world to be concerned about. This is not one of them
I know precisely what you are driving at here and it is hogwash just as Jeff Rense and his conspiracies are hogwash.
2006-12-09 07:35:29 · answer #2 · answered by Rich B 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
so what your saying is that due to the organised way in which a building collapses is sufficient evidence to suggest the building was demolished by other forces other than the fire itself.
I think it is more interesting that this same supposedly weak steel frame managed to consume a plane travelling at 400mph, without any part of it passing right through the building, not once but twice. No wings sticking out.....also where was the remains of the aircraft sticking out of the pentagon?, small hole, large plane, no pictures of building with added tailfin!..
the towers collapsed so neatly, i do think there is something in this suggestion of foul play. If movies can make people believe what happens in front of them, why not 'real' news footage...have you seen 'wag the dog' with Rob De Niro.
I think the world will be a lot older, before we ever get close to ever finding out what really happened.
2006-12-09 07:40:37 · answer #3 · answered by Cy 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I didn't really understand the clip i'm afraid, apart from the obvious. What was it trying to say, and what are you trying to say? If the first still building stood for 15 hours and the WTC only managed a few hours someone somewhere (other than the terrorist attack) 'made' the building collapse. Architects from the 1970's planned all this.... perhaps I'm being dense......
2006-12-09 07:44:44 · answer #4 · answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it extremely is fantastic! and that i by no skill use that note! a million. in no way! 2. probable no longer, even with the undeniable fact that it really is unlucky. such quite some human beings have the thoughts-set ,"i do not want my baby seeing some woman's boobs!" nicely, in the journey that they see a lady breastfeeding and they ask questions, only telling them "She is feeding her infant" may actually help them comprehend breasts are for feeding children and by no skill advance up seeing breasts as in common words sexual. some human beings say that it really is as a lot because the moms and dads to search for suggestion from from their toddlers about breastfeeding later...i imagine I really might want to disagree with that. Breastfeeding is common and it really is how humanity survived till decrease than one hundred years in the past. the moms and dads which have the thoughts-set that breastfeeding is a few thing they opt to describe to their baby at the same time as their older, are probable going to be the moms and dads that bypass on the theory that breastfeeding is extraordinary or gross or unusual...and that is only no longer the way it truly is.
2016-11-25 01:14:24 · answer #5 · answered by merickel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm.interesting but as others have mentioned.
same design?
same steel?
contents?
materials used to build around steel frame?
fire barriers/blankets used during construction?
sprinkler/fire alarm system in each building?
list goes on mate.not american but worked indirectly on new builds and these are just a few queries off top of my head!
hope this gives u more info!??!
2006-12-09 07:58:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i understand that they burnt for a long time but i don't know how long buildings can be expected to burn for? presumably not that long. doesn't take into account what was in the building or what else was used in the construction.
sorry for being a bit thick but as you wanted to know how understandable the clip is this might help!!!!
2006-12-09 07:40:18 · answer #7 · answered by aria 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nice try, but you cant discount varying construction types and methods.
Additionally, the WTC towers fell because if the IMPACT, not just the fire. Simple physics tells you that!
2006-12-09 08:01:46 · answer #8 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
why the hell would you show that to a child!?!?! and I'm sure he/she would. its just burning building. and that you would question if your on office building is secure or would it fall. so really the big question is are you safe?
2006-12-09 07:35:25 · answer #9 · answered by narsi_hunter 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I understand the clip. No, I don't care....Not American :)
2006-12-09 07:46:45 · answer #10 · answered by Ferret 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋