As a free thinker I believe every American is the same under the Constitution. Despite of name.
2006-12-09 07:25:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As a free thinker I choose not to support him because he is a democrat, not because of his name.
2006-12-09 07:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
for sure Republicans and Hillary Clinton think of that the call would be counted, and reverberate interior the electorate' ears as "an A-rab soundin' call", or they does not save bringing it up. (in basic terms like lots of of the writers on Y!A Politics for the previous few days....) And, regrettably, i think of that it does be counted to many, many electorate; that's been shown repeatedly, that our electorate are uninformed, and oftentimes vote per "seems" or preconceived "emotions" or call attractiveness. (And, in Obama's case, they might "understand" his call as "that guy from I-rak") EDIT: study a number of those solutions, and you will see what I advise. Why might his call "advance flags"? (do no longer you think of if he replaced right into a terrorist he could be extremely much less seen?) we at the instant are not "at war with Muslims". i'm no longer extremely particular WHO we are at replaced into with, besides the shown fact that it genuinely is NOTall Muslims!! So what if he went to a Muslim college? I went to a Catholic college--does not advise I espouse Catholicism, does it? human beings do no longer even look to know the version between the Muslim faith, and the fanatical politics of the Islamic radicals. those muddled-headed electorate scare me extra effective than terrorists! ..
2016-10-14 08:37:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not his name that poses the problem for me.
For me it is his complete lack of doing anything but make a dazzling speech. Did he even write that speech? Is the democratic party so desperate that they have put this man up on a pedestal as their new golden boy?
I mean seriously what has the guy done? Or the fact that he is a black, charismatic man supposed to be enough to get people to vote for him?
2006-12-09 07:29:37 · answer #3 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Not the name. I do not vote for a person based on his or her name. I vote for a person based on the beliefs and actions they have made apparent. Remember, actions do not always match what a person says they believe.
2006-12-09 07:41:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No but Hillary is more credible and Experienced then Obama, I we're Barack Obama I would wait a Couple of years.
2006-12-09 07:30:38 · answer #5 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, but his lack of experience does. He's wanting to be too much too soon if he's thinking about running for president.
2006-12-09 07:48:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, his name poses no problem for me. However, his platform does.
2006-12-09 07:51:04 · answer #7 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Names don't pose problems
People do!
2006-12-09 07:37:02 · answer #8 · answered by jy9900 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I would not want to have a president with some name like that. To be honest, the U.S. will never have a black president
2006-12-09 07:30:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No.
I think that's self evident
2006-12-09 07:28:09 · answer #10 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋