One of the Closing reports of the Redpublican Congress. It's OK No crime no foul. It is permissable to bugger little boys as long as it is in the closet.
2006-12-09 06:01:30 · 14 answers · asked by 43 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BOTH sides of the Congressional aisle have their freaks, pedophiles, thieves and liars, as does the Senate. These people are the elite, they are mostly untouchable. They love this political bias fighting, it keeps the focus off the fact that they are a club made up of both Democrat and Republican alike, the thing they ALL have in common is that they want more wealth...BOTH sides. Get over yourselves, the only people who are surprised at the depths our leaders will sink are the people who are standing on the far extreme side of one party or the other.
Liberals AND Conservatives are guilty. The system is broken, it needs to be redone from the top down and this crap isn't helping.
2006-12-09 06:18:48 · answer #1 · answered by Rich B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
till Mitch is incredibly "Tibor R. Machan...the R. C. Hoiles Chair in business enterprise Ethics & loose business enterprise at Chapman college's Argyros college of B&E and...a study fellow on the Pacific study Institute (San Francisco, CA) and the Hoover employer (Stanford college, CA)," then Mitch's answer demonstrates a incredibly versatile techniques-set to the question of whether plagiarism, a minimum of, is ethical. Frankly, i've got in no way seen an purpose ethical device in action. Even people who declare to persist with one generally element situations and different issues into their ethical judgments and are far extra stringent approximately making use of their "purpose" ethical judgments while they don't comprehend or like the guy they are judging. they have a tendency to get very relativist while they are spoke of as upon to choose the movements of somebody they comprehend and prefer.
2016-12-13 05:48:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay I would give you a response but the premise of your question is completely dishonest. Foley wrote email and IMs, the very act was offensive and I am glad he is gone, but there has been no evidence of actual sexual activity. If you want to be taken seriously post facts not fantasy, but knowing the type of answers you give I suspect this is not a realistic possibilty for you.
2006-12-09 06:13:51 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I question the ethics of a party who allow members to conduct themselves in ways that contradict the ethics for which the party stands for as long as they publicly espouse policy which they themselves do not practice.
2006-12-09 06:13:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you tell us exactly what law he broke? I don't like the guy and think he engaged in innappropriate activities, but it isn't clear to me that he broke the law. He sent some innappropriate emails. I don't think there is evidence of buggering of little boys. If you have it, give it to the police.
2006-12-09 06:41:12 · answer #5 · answered by FrederickS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but if follows the same ethics as Barney Frank and Gerry Studds. Must be a blue state thing.
2006-12-09 06:05:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wonder what the answers would be if the parents of the pages were asked. Anyone who justifies the findings of no violations by this report is a lowlife scumbag.
2006-12-09 06:20:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never trust any report from the organization that investigates itself.
Whether Foley or Wright. it's wrong in the rest of the world
2006-12-09 06:07:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Glad to see the bunch of Do-Little's got around to some really important issues..... Not surprised with the results either....Most pigs don't think other pigs stink,either......
2006-12-09 06:08:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't agree with any group that investigates themselves.
2006-12-09 06:05:07 · answer #10 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋