Why or why not?
(Yes, I know you have to establish monarchy as a system of government to have actual royalty. I'm asking if you think they are trying to MODEL themselves in that manner, not actually become royalty.)
2006-12-09 04:39:36 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I think the media tried to portray them that way, but I don't exactly think the families themselves try to. Granted, the whole Camelot thing with the Kennedys was about as close as you could get...
2006-12-09 04:44:44 · answer #1 · answered by Leah 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I too have heard that the Kennedy's were considered "American Royalty". Some people even refer to the JFK days as "Camelot". When I hear that non-sense it makes me want to vomit.
I guess Ted Kennedy would be the heir-apparent. Although I have no idea what his title is. Clown Prince of Drunkenness?
2006-12-09 04:45:33 · answer #2 · answered by robertbdiver 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bushes are a royal pain in the a**.
2006-12-09 06:36:16 · answer #3 · answered by Lady T 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kennedys have tried & failed. Bushes haven't tried.
2006-12-09 04:41:19 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think the citizens are trying to make them that way.
2006-12-09 04:43:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
2006-12-09 04:42:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋