First, you have to think about symbolism: flowers. The children are flowers in the spring--new, innocent, blooming, growing into maturity. Flowers need sunlight and proper nutrition to blossom. The twins had neither. There also needs to be a healthy, natural environment--they had neither. Without these things, flowers wilt and children die. Think about the birds and the bees and their role in the flower chain. The result of improper fertilization (breeding) means mutation; therefore, the parents' relationship and the unnatural relationship that formed in the attic are also causes for death and improper growth. You were perceptive to pick up on the parents being an issue. If the children were raised naturally, like flowers in the meadow, and produced naturally (birds and bees and such) they would have, indeed, been healthy. However, everything about their genetics and their environment was unnatural, and the introduction of more poison to their systems was the final straw. Still, you can poison a flower or a weed and it can still fight and sprout through the cracks in the cement. The result is not the beautiful, vibrant rose in its garden, but something aberrant and pitiful.
Yes, I think the grandmother was as cruel and selfish as the mother. She was not innocent, and, in fact, I wonder if it was not her idea? What do you think? Have you read the rest of the books? There are three more (to the best of my recollection), and you may get a better idea if you read the rest of the series.
As for you thinking you might be wrong in loving Chris's undying love, well, that is the point. When we know all of the facts and all of the thoughts and feelings and reasons behind any act, we tend to look at that act differently. We judge people based upon the little pieces of external information we recieve about them, but we never get to know the truth (we cannot read minds and understand motives). However, even Chris and Cathy knew that their love was unnatural. I guess, if I had a wish for them, it would be to get back into the sunlight of living, get a lot of counseling, and accept the fact that who they were is not who they are now or who they can become in the future... that, however, is just a meaningless observation. But, you have to wonder...if you grow unnaturally (like the weed in the cement) would you ever have a chance to become the rose, even if you were transplanted?
P.S.
You are correct. No one really shared back then--not like they do now (Dr. Phil, Springer, Oprah, etc.). Can you imagine all the horrible sorted things that must have been happening, people knowing that they would never be found out.... I think Flowers was really the first of its kind, and very much a part of the change we have seen in "confessing" and sharing the dark secrets of the past. Only by communication can we scare off the preditors of innocence. I agree that VC Andrews was a superb author! She really put it all out there for us. I read Flowers way back in 1980... I remember being shocked and angry and heartbroken. I have a lot of books in my library by the literary giants, and hers is right there, alongside theirs. I think she was top-notch.
2006-12-09 04:48:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by mad_madison_maiden_x 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I agree with the former answer that it was lack of proper nutrition. Sunlight provides vitamin D though so it could have contributed.
I think it would have been have cool if the third novel was written out of Chris's point of view.
I just loved the one that was in Jory's point of view. His story just breaks my heart. He is my fave character.
2006-12-09 04:33:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Whit 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the main reason the twins didn't grow was a lack of proper nutrition, rather than lack of sunlight.
I'm not sure when the mother started poisoning them... probably not until late in their captivity, else they would have died much sooner. Nope, I think the mother wanted them dead: because of the whole deal with her father (the kids' grandfather) that if he found out she had kids, she wouldn't get her inheritance.
2006-12-09 04:24:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by willow oak 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This e book has been around for a protracted, long term. i do no longer comprehend of any unfastened web content, yet i'm guessing ebay could have a replica on the marketplace particularly inexpensively. I used to envision V.C. Andrews books. Then she died.
2016-10-05 02:22:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by wichern 4
·
0⤊
0⤋