i watched that documentary loose change second edition and most of it u can see the webpage or newpaper and it questions many thing. wat do you think?
2006-12-09 04:01:57 · 8 answers · asked by imputh 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
they(EXPLOSIVES) would have had to been on every floor for the building to fall at freefall speed as it so clearly did.Also in the subbasement and on the core columns top to bottom.
The fact is that the WTC fell at virtually free fall speed.A true pancake collapse would have taken at least 30 secs.
The tower had alot of security down time with cameras off so it is feasible that this could happen.
The bomb sniffing dogs were called off 5 days before 9/11 so conceivably the building was PREVIOUSLY wired DURING these down times and the the actual explosives were placed during this 5 day window.
The most important point in this paragraph is THAT THE BUILDINGS CAME DOWN AT VIRTUALLY FREEFALL SPEED.!!
WHICH MEANS THAT RESISTANCE WAS REMOVED FOR EVERY FALLING FLOOR.Which could only be done with explosives to free up the floor for the one falling above it
Anyone can time it themselves with a watch on the videos available.This fact alone was not addressed properly by FEMA or NIST IN the 9/11 report as well as a host of other facts.The popular mechanics article is at best weak and inconclusive.
This is a pic of one of the columns at WTC.Nobody disputes its authenticity.
.
It clearly shows a cut core.15years as a diver and steel worker and I can assure you ,that is not a torch cut.However it is ENTIRELY consistent with set directional charges used in demolition.
People say"oh well ,that is only one column" mY QUESTION IS how many columns would it take to convince you?If explosives were not used ,that cut column has no business being there now does it?
The FEMA investigators were not even allowed on site and the steel was taken away and sold as quickly as possible.To Baosteel in China at 25% below market.WITHOUT BEING EXAMINED WHICH IS LAW IN new york state where fire occurs in highrise steel fires!!
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=138415
2006-12-09 04:07:50 · answer #1 · answered by Paul I 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the guy making this declare stated that the towers experience at 'resistance-unfastened velocity'. yet in case you're taking a check out photos and movies of the give way, you will see debris from the tower falling swifter than the tower itself (or, from the region interior the tower it replaced into ejected from). This shows that the towers did no longer give way 'resistance-unfastened'. If the author of the e book has made this variety of elementary blunders as above (and something truly basic to analyze), then the the remainder of his artwork might desire to be recognized as the two adverse. So sarah b: You claimed that for the duration of straightforward terms 'human beings' believe the valid tale approximately 9/11... sorry, that may no longer genuine. i'm Canadian, and whilst i do no longer help each and all the strikes of Bush and employer, i'm no longer silly sufficient to believe 9/11 replaced into an interior interest. in addition to, you will locate peer reviewed articles related to the give way of the WTC a million&2 with the help of authors in countries different than the U.S.
2016-10-14 08:23:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not a fan of conspiracy theories. For the most part, for them to be true, dozens of people would have to be in on it and someone would say something to someone and let the cat out of the bag.
I think some fantatical terrorists decided to make their mark on the U.S. and took down several planes.
2006-12-09 04:05:18 · answer #3 · answered by Robbie trd 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there are many explanations to most everything they say, its hard to find, but keep looking, i beleived it too, before i went and done the research. I"m thinking it probably was just a MASSIVE failure on our government to keep us safe.And that's only my opinion, i could be wrong.
2006-12-09 04:11:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The real story is the terrorists killed many innocent people that day. All those bull stories about the U.S government doing the attacks dishonor those who died that day.
2006-12-09 04:06:17 · answer #5 · answered by redneckking_99 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with strike.
2006-12-09 04:05:11 · answer #6 · answered by Jeremy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
more likely than a space alien attack..
that was what i thought happened
2006-12-09 04:06:20 · answer #7 · answered by ken y 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
BOGUS.
2006-12-09 04:04:09 · answer #8 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋