of course i would. but the person would have to be a fit to my company. i want my business to do well and having intelligent people on the payroll makes things easier for me. training costs would be lower and therefore beneficial for me.
2006-12-09 02:02:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, I would, the emplyee is usually the first line of "defence" in a business, the person customers deal with, therefore that is important.
But the IQ is not what I look at. I look at the personality and attitude of the perosn. Many times the IQ won't help in difficult situations.
I need my employees to be bold in order to resolve problems. This is just a line of thought you can think of.
2006-12-09 02:03:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Q 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
psychological retardation is often defined as an IQ decrease than 70 (however this relies upon on the favored deviation). standard is one hundred. there is not any threshold for genius. remember that there is not any normally happening IQ scale. the common will consistently be one hundred, yet how severe or low a score is relies upon on the favored Deviation (SD) of the try. maximum tests use a SD of 15 or sixteen, yet some tests use 24 the place a score of 148 might translate to one hundred thirty on a try that makes use of SD 15. there is likewise no maximum IQ available. maximum tests have a optimal available score you will get on them (as an occasion, the main subject-unfastened professional try interior the U. S., WAIS, has a optimal available score of a hundred and sixty SD 15). even though if, in theory IQ has no challenge. Statistically the best individual interior the international at the instant residing might have an IQ of around 195 SD 15. the best individual to haved ever walked the face of the Earth, 2 hundred-205 SD 15. At any 2nd an Alien from yet another planet might desire to land in the international however, and have an IQ of one thousand. it is likewise available a human might desire to attain over 205 on an IQ try (on condition that the try might desire to certainly diploma that top), even though if it would be quite inconceivable.
2016-12-11 05:30:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question is good for some homonyms.Would you hire a person with an IQ very much higher than your own.Good employees are not necessarily those with the highest IQ's.Initiative, resourcefulness, perseverance, social and diplomatic skills and stamina can be equally important. Read Emotional Intelligence.(see below)
2006-12-10 08:32:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by kalusz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I had an IQ of 130, I would as the person above said, spell hire correctly. The person would have to be interested in my line of work. I wouldn't hire a mechanic for a CFO position, no matter how high his IQ was.
2006-12-09 02:12:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Professor Sheed 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
If higher IQ meant they'd act responsibly and with respect towards others, then I would hire them. However, it's possible for a person to be "smart" but act downright stupid. IQ is a measure of a person's capability to mentally grow, a sort of "how big is the container?" So alone, it would not affect my desire, or lack of, to hire someone.
2006-12-09 02:08:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by erythisis 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
IQ isn't everything. Many brilliant people don't have people skills or other traits important to specific fields. So, it depends on the job.
Incidentally, it's "hire", not higher.
2006-12-09 02:07:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by IknowEVERYTHING 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
IQ is absolutely irrelevant to a person's intelligence. an employment oppurtunity should not rely on a person's IQ
2006-12-09 01:59:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I wouldn't employ anyone who thought HIRE was spelled HIGHER. No matter what their IQ.
2006-12-09 01:58:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by JHUguy123 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
yes i would, they'd be great for the business,
2006-12-09 01:59:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by rchlbsxy2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋