Rote exercises are more than just memorization. They teach you on a deeper level. You create motor pathways in your brain. For deep knowledge, rote is actually easier -- and more powerful -- than analytical learning.
Actually, repetition is the oldest way of learning. It goes back to the ancient Greeks. They taught by imitating great masters. Aristotle explained that the way to be a great writer is to imitate great writers.
It's also the way tai chi and kung fu have been taught for thousands of years. The master has the student do the same patterns over and over again -- patterns the student can't begin to understand -- until one day, the meaning becomes clear to the student. He masters the nuances -- and moves on to become a master himself. Even today in karate studios, you see the same principle in action. Those who follow the path become black belts.
2006-12-09 06:37:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a teacher I feel that the answer is no for every subject but math...if we are learning the 50 states its better to learn a fact from each state and how that state joined the United States rather then just learning the state. For example I will always know that Florida is a state because I can associate Florida with St. Augustine, etc. I think its better to be able to associate something with something that you are learning because not only are you learning something more about the subject but you will also be able to learn more because you will have an association. Some people feel that rote learning is better suited for math and spelling words...however, I feel instead of giving spelling words give students sentences with the words in them, or make them read a book...that is how I learned how to spell. As for math...this is the only place that I would use rote learning. You need to know addition, subtraction, and multiplication. The only real way to know that is to memorize the answers.
2006-12-09 02:03:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by jeno75831 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a move in education right now to differentiate instruction. This means that you have to experiment to find what works for each of your individual students and then find ways to accommodate their learning needs in your classroom. If you know that a handful of your students learn best from rote learning then it is your responsibility to incorporate that WHILE giving the other students the option to learn in their own style. Carol Tomlinson advocates differentiating the content, process and product to allow the students to learn best. You can still use rote learning if you know it works for some of your students, but you should never use only one instructional strategy to teach a key idea.
2006-12-09 06:22:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jetgirly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I, like most people on the autistic spectrum need to learn by rote then build upon these pictures we create in our minds. Very simply reading a passage then expecting to go forward with it doesn't work as well for people with photographic memories and very high pattern recognition.
Memorising is good for building the confidence, then we "fill in the blanks".
To Michael, very well written and makes sense. It would be great if more schools would let children create their own knowledge instead of doing the analytical. It only ever frustrated me.
2006-12-09 04:27:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by KD 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it's the only way learning that will happen, I think rote learning is better than not learning at all.
2006-12-09 01:43:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by rgdet 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your purpose is to teach your son or daughter becomes smooth in studying equally money and lowercase letters. You then will need this system, Children Learning Reading from here https://tr.im/MOdQb .
Children Learning Reading shows your youngster phonemes so they've a very strong foundation in the abilities which will allow them to be on to be a prolific reader. With Children Learning Reading will even centers around building on the abilities learnt to allow your son or daughter to take their studying skills to the next level.
With Children Learning Reading is simple to instruct your child how to read.
2016-04-30 23:18:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. Obviously it doesn't work for every concept, or even for a majority of concepts. It does, however, still have its place in education. Multiplication tables are a prime example. Google some info on memorization and you'll find that there are plenty of benefits to it. :)
2006-12-09 14:25:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by elizabeth_ashley44 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Back in our time.
We mastered the new universal language-speech-read-write-calculate-analyse and think with basic skills vital for our own survival and advancement of ourselves on planet earth.
Today we lost that universal gifts of life and function like a desk-top with input and output with ghost stories and multi-skills in planet of apes.
2006-12-09 19:06:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
possibly for more stamp-collector -ey forms of knowledge like varieties of plants, or the constellations or groups of chemicals
2006-12-09 01:43:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by mesun1408 6
·
0⤊
1⤋