You mean the Democrats? Of course they have a double standard.
They decry the "Culture of corruption" while trying to promote their most corrupt politicians to power, such as Jack "Cut and Run" Murtha and Alstee Hastings (an impeached judge).
They scream over emails from Foley to young former male Pages, but give one of their own 3 standing ovations for actually sleeping with a male page (If you are a Dem its just diversity).
You call the Republicans racists at every turn while Senator Robert Byrd, former member of the KKK, uses the "N word" with little rebuke from his own party.
This is just the tip of he iceberg, watch for the real culture of corruption to begin now, and the media to cover it up;)
2006-12-09 00:12:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eric K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My leftist father once told me to think what I want to. Now that I grew up, he detests many of my ideas and asks how I came to these conservative thoughts after being raised by good liberal democratic union members like he and his father. He always said think for yourself, develop your own opinons. Now he rants and raves about the smallest items and says I don't know the true facts, even if I never stated an opinion.
I think he's out of his gourd, now that I think differently than he does, I am a dork and am no longer entitled to my own opionion since it doesn't match his. (Well, I couldn't think of a different descriptive than dork, but you catch my drift)
He loves Bill Clinton, yet I say, how can anyone trust a guy when his OWN wife cannot trust him?
He calls George Bush an idiot, however George Bush is on his second term in the White House and my dad isn't, I'd say that makes George at least a little smarter than an idiot.
I do not like people who speak badly about MY president without merit. So many people now are saying we should pull out of Iraq, however those are the people with HINDSIGHT, now they want to call the President incompetent, when really we are not privvy to ALL the information that is his to access. I am sure there was sufficient evidence to indicate why it was so imperative to send in troops to divide Iraq away from a ruler of terror. When this began there were multi-national troops right in there alongside our troops, one by one the other countries became intimidated through the terroristic tactics of our enemies, we stand there today perhaps alone, but in reality, was all the loss worth it if we just pack it in right now and tell the new leadership who have not gained control, okay now guys, it's all yours!
It was right after 9/11, a day that will live in infamy forever in the minds of all Americans who were alive that day.
I read that there is still postal mail being addressed to the zip code that once belonged ONLY to the World Trade Center, where does it all end? Why don't the senders know it doesn't exist any longer?
2006-12-09 10:04:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Granny Boo boo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It must be reported, the function of marriage became initially for toddlers and for this reason sex (because both are/were tied). Now what function of gay marriage is for toddlers? ok, i understand issues are different. decrease back then sex=hertrosexual sex=toddlers and that became that. there became also extra animosity to the conception of adopting. Now the problem has grew to grow to be. convinced, sex now no longer equals toddlers or opposing genitalia, even with the undeniable fact that the establishments have not quite tailored. also the justifications for no longer adopting have lessened now. quite, this question misses the point. the authentic question is what society needs 'marriage' interior the destiny to be about? Is it about love or toddlers or both? Marriage in society became continually about the toddlers quite, some thing else got here with the equipment by condition. If the love began the marriage, the toddlers may end it off. And that became the point, to strengthen toddlers. If I were in cost, gay marriage may be allowed, yet all marriage does no longer confer any style of monetary or social earnings except toddlers are in touch. it really isn't any longer for the state to sponsor 2 human beings's love life, except they have toddlers, earlier particularly a lot certainly guaranteed. with regard to the warped political problem between Obama, his critics and leave out California. couldn't leave out C have copied Obama? possibly Obama study her opinion and idea "I agree" and her words stuck in his head. Why is it he has to look insincere/disingenuous? perchance he thinks anybody asks the incorrect questions and has given up being concerned? Bob
2016-11-25 00:41:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
left parties always in double standards
2006-12-09 00:09:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have no idea of what "left parties double standards" means. Perhaps you could enlighten me.
2006-12-09 00:09:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by gtoacp 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Recent events..enjoying power at centre with out responsibility, opposing economic policies at centre, but adopting in West Bengal...shows how left is bankrupty ideologically. They do not beleive in any system or ideology, but only intended to enjoy fruits of power with out owning it.
2006-12-10 03:45:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by naren 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are just like that: Throught India they shout for workers, farmers rights. In their own home state, they beat them, blood shed. Have you seen the videos on television.
Don't believe them at all. They are just exploiting farmers in their home state. They should never emerge better on National Level.
2006-12-10 18:21:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sunlight 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not at all surprised, the majority do not pretend to be Christians.
2006-12-09 07:15:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
good question.
They are in india for supporting MAO ideology.
2006-12-09 00:03:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
THEY ARE SELFISH THEY HAVE NO IDEOLOGY OF COMMUNISM EQUAL THEY LOOK LIKE CONGRESS PARTY.
2006-12-09 00:09:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7
·
0⤊
0⤋