9-11, Seemed a little unanswered to you?

Question

Who feels our government was behind the 9-11 attacks on theWorld Trade Center? If U disagree, search 9-11 in Google Videos,watch a couple videos, then respond.

Answer 1

OK again, sigh.

Yes, I've seen the video many, many times and a few that you might not have seen.

I’ve followed up on many of the theory’s out there and most are people who didn’t do their research and are mistaken about something. My favorite is that the fire couldn’t have gotten hot enough to melt steel; therefore someone had to blow the building up. They looked up the melting point of steel and looked how hot the fire was and low and behold the fire wasn’t hot enough. Sounds good doesn’t it. Well, just because the fire wasn’t hot enough to melt steel doesn’t mean it wasn’t hot enough to weaken it to the point it was like hot plastic. When I was looking at building a log home three or four years about one of the manufactures of log homes had a picture of a burnt out building. The picture showed the charred log beams holding up bent steel beams. The steel beam hung like wet spaghetti over the wooden ones. The fire didn’t melt the steel just weaken it until it could no longer support its own weight. They were trying to point out that in some cases wood is stronger than steel.

I could take on every issue in the vidio, if you wish, but there's a quicker way to answer your question.

Think about how many people would have to be involved to pull this off. How long would it take just to wire a building? Weeks if you have a huge crew, months if you have a smaller crew. That crew would have be drill holes in the supports run wire all over the building. Don't you think at least one person would have noticed that they were drilling holes into the building? Or did the government silence all the maintenance staff too. Wouldn’t at least one person talk to their wife, girlfriend, or lovers? Even if you got all the building wired without anybody noticing, what about the workers who set the explosives? Did the government manage to get everyone involved onto the planes that crashed? How would they know the workers would be available? They could have been on vacations, in the hospital?

Now even if the government didn’t kill all the workers, why should the workers keep quiet? Think about it if you know something I don’t want you to tell the ONLY way to make SURE you don’t say anything is to kill you. But if you talk and spread the truth out, what can I do? Nothing killing you then would lead to more people believing you. And the whole thing would blow up in my face.

Really the government is terrible about keeping secrets. If someone in government knew and thought they could make brownie points for the next election you’d see it all over the New York Times.

Post and edit if you want me to really go into details. It’ll be long and boring, the truth usually is.

Enough said

Answer 2

Conspiracy theorists often look at minute anomylies within a case without considering the major ones. They also make quite a few mistakes and blow them out of proportion. Let me explain:

Conspiracy theorists (CT) have said that the jet that crashed in Pennsylvania was not really real in that it was reported to have landed in Cleveland.
The mistake: By mistake a Jet that landed in Cleveland was said to have been the flight in question, however it was actually another flight. The error was by the air flight controller.

CT claim: The hole made by the crash into the pentagon was too small to have been made by a Jet, so it never happened.

The facts: The "hole" was actually a photo of one of the holes in the exterior of the Pentagon, and it was made by one of the engines. The other point of entry was pretty huge and definitely one that would suggest the entry of a Jet. Also, there was wreckage from a Jet all over the place.

CT claim: The way the WTC fell was definitely a "Controlled Demolition".

Ok, this is where the CT's really go off the deep end. Thousands of workers were in and out of the WTC every day, and to pack the place with thousands of pounds of explosives with absolutely NO witness or leaker is impossible. Also, everyone witnessed the Jets flying into the buildings in the first place. Where they also make an error is that they expect that a jet hitting the WTC would have resulted in a more assymetrical destruction of the building, rather than the "pancaking" of the building from the top down. It is logical, however, when you consider that the factor that destroyed the buildings was not the crash, it was the fire. Both jets were loaded with fuel, and the resulting fire heated the supporting beams to the point where they lost most of their strength. As soon as a few broke, all the weight from above began to smash down in a cascading force.

So as you can see, the whole 9/11 conspiracy hoopla is totally bogus.

Answer 3

There is not a single 9/11 conspiracy theory that I find remotely plausible.

* The gov't shot down United 93. - That claim has been debunked so many times that repeating it only soils the memory of the heroes of the flight.

* The gov't was behind the attacks. - There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start. First, what possible reason would the US gov't have to kill 3000 of its own? Second, Bush is nowhere near smart enough to arrange it. Third, it would require so many agencies of the gov't working together that that alone makes it impossible, much less keeping it secret. Besides, doesn't the fact that Osama admitted to it mean anything to anyone?

* The FDNY was ordered to implode the building. - Okay, the FDNY lost 343 good men and women because they were busy planting explosives with such perfect precision that the building imploded straight down. Does that make sense to anyone?

* The Zionists/Mossad/Israel was behind the attacks. 4000 Jews stayed home from work. - First, this was started by Hezbollah, which, before 9/11, led all terrorist orgs in number of Americans killed. Second, many Jews were among the dead and injured. I guess they missed the email. Third, many Christians and Muslims and others took the day off or were late. Did they get the email instead of the Jews? Or was it that 9/11/01 was primary day in New York State and some people of all religious backgrounds needed to work on campaigns that day?

* Mossad knew about the attacks beforehand. - This is true. Mossad, MI6, the CIA and FBI, and other intelligence agencies worldwide all knew something was going to happen. Unfortunately, no one knew what, when, how, where, or by whom.

Answer 4

For David M, bearing on the question with regard to the Bin weighted down's being flown out of the U. S. mutually as everybody else replaced into grounded is subsidized up by employing a information article in Miami newspapers 2 days after 9/11. additionally Robert Wright (an FBI agent) spoke out announcing the Bush's and Bin weighted down's trip mutually. do no longer forget that the Bush's have been given their oil agency off the floor from between the Bin weighted down relatives members. there is the investment from the ISI agent who transferred $a hundred,000 to Muhammed Atta on 9/11. as properly as this ISI agent replaced into traveling US intelligence brokers merely days after 9/11 interior the U. S.. there is likewise the fact of why did NORAD stand down? Why has the acknowledgment of the 7 hijackers that have been pronounced alive and properly by employing the BBC no longer stated interior the U. S.? Why replaced into the testimony of William Rodriguez (former janitor of the WTC a million who worked there for 20yrs) by no potential used? could it have been the undeniable fact that he replaced into interior the basement while he encountered a great explosion seconds in the previous the 1st airplane hit? Why are not we allowed to work out the different movies of in spite of hit the Pentagon? there have been a minimum of a dozen different safety cameras which could've captured what hit the Pentagon, yet they have been confiscated minutes after it replaced into hit. Why did Giuliani have each and all of the WTC steel hauled off to China to be melted down? He, being a former prosecuter could understand a element or 2 approximately keeping information. particularly to a criminal offense scene that replaced into by no potential independently investigated.

Answer 5

I would say that many things are very unanswered...and if they have been "answered" that they have not been answered honestly.

I am sure we'll all find out in 30-40 years....

I am not much of a conspiracy theorist, but when it comes to "Trust your government", I'd say "Why the hell should I?"

Take a look at our breif past as a nation, and I ask you: When has their not been corruption and conspiracy?

----

I do find it funny that we still have not found Osama...and does anyone seem to give a damn?

I have even caught people saying "Yeah! That'll teach Sadaam for blowing up our WTC"

...what a country....I can't wait to move to Canada or Europe.

Answer 6

I feel it no more than the government is involved in fake moon landings, Roswell aliens and flat earth conspiracies.
Conspiracy Theorists have lost so much credibility that the only conspiracy around are the very these people who hock dubious facts and surreal imaginations. Where are the planes that if they not crashed into the buildings? Where are the people on those planes? Were air traffic controllers in this too? Why did Bin Laden admit to doing it? Why did the people on the planes tell their loved ones they were being hijacked? Why did one stewardess phone to the ground she saw the plane heading towards buildings.
Lots of questions the theorists refuse to look at or involve in their stories. These have to be explained satisfactory because what really happened?
They try to get around by saying it is not up to them to answer that. What?!!!!!! They are the ones making the accusations they are the ones making up the story of what they say happened. But they wash their hands on fundimental questions they have to be answered if missiles hit the buildings instead of commerical aircraft.
The only hoax is the conspiracy theorist that only a theory models which every one neglects the logical asking questions of "if what you say is true then what happened to.....?"
Their answer - we don't want to discuss that.

Answer 7

I've watched the videos and am still unconvinced. It seems unlikely that the government could get away with a scheme like this for very long. I am concerned, however, that they have not been up front with the American people.

Answer 8

I wonder too. Securacom was run by Neil Bush who was involved in the Silverado Savings and Loan scandal. Securacom was also a company that provided security services to American Airlines and the WTC as well as others. I also noticed that the Carlyle group closely tied to the past and current bush administration profited enormously from this incident as well as current conflicts worldwide. Check out who is on the board of directors past and present..............

Answer 9

well, it's very confusing with all the media pushing and covering, but if you come to think of it.... how is the winner from all this? ......

the only benefit goes for the US government which makes it alot more complicated than we think....huh? anyway, it's a shameful act, took alot of lives for power and control.

Although there is these rumors, that in hat day, most of the VIPs and the key persons working in the towers weren't there during the incident..... which only raises more doubts!!!

Answer 10

I don't. I wish some of the strange people who keep asking this would tell us why our government would want to do something like that.