The George W Bush war in Iraq was premeditated and unprovoked. All his reasons for going to war were lies. Many young American are still getting killed for unpatriotic reasons except those that serves the ego of Bush and his cohorts. Many more Iraqis children, women and civilian are getting killed when Bush & Co toppled Sadam. Sadam is now being accuse of crimes against humanity in a tramped up court even if assuming indeed he had some people killed. What do you think?
2006-12-08 23:14:08 · 9 answers · asked by C L M 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The answer was no, is no, and will be no next week.
2006-12-08 23:17:55 · answer #1 · answered by Bawney 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
On a level playing field the lot of them would be in prison awaiting their trial. But Bush made sure his playing field was tilted in his favor. He refused to sign up with the international court system that would have the power to prosecute him and his partners in crime. The Democrats will not impeach him just to prove that they are above the partisan witch hunt that the Republicans subjected Clinton to. The Republicans still seem to act as if Bush is God. So who is going to prosecute him? It is to bad that we can't all just line up and *****-slap him until he gets the message!
2006-12-08 23:30:19 · answer #2 · answered by industrialconfusion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No crimes were committed and Congress voted for the war, democrats included.
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed.
If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/
2006-12-09 00:23:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon on what you mean by using punishment. I doubt that he will have any difficulty with the regulation, yet for something of his existence (and longer) his u . s . will bear in mind his strikes. each action has a effect. some could interpret those effects as punishments.
2016-10-18 00:35:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
considering the alternaitve was the clinton botched attempt to capture bin laden in 92 (ignoring the sudanese and playing with his cigar box), perhaps you need to be considering thanking mr. bush for maintaining your right and freedom to ask ignorant questions.
2006-12-08 23:18:14 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No
You actually have to COMMIT a crime against humanity to be prosecuted...
2006-12-08 23:15:38 · answer #6 · answered by delgados12 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They should be. But there's no chance they ever will be. If they were, we'd have conservatives turning into suicide bombers and attacking the courthouse. Lol.
2006-12-08 23:17:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think it is time for breakfast.
Beyond that I think you are confused.
Wait!! I just had another thought. I think it is funny that people create new nicknames to ask really dumb questions.
2006-12-08 23:20:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
What do I think? I think you need to go and get educated and stop repeating what you have heard.
2006-12-08 23:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by Teufel 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋