English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-08 23:09:28 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

yes, terrorist like sadam, bin laden, i'am french and i wonder how american people can trust this guy.

2006-12-08 23:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by Odie 7 · 1 3

War is not terrorism. Get your terminology correct. Terror is violence and resulting fear that is purposely inflicted upon civilian populations to get them to act a certain way for the terrorists agenda.
.
The US doesn't attack civilians, but they do get in the way when terrorists hide in the civilian population... (something that the US military doesn't do).

If Bush was a terrorist he could and would have killed everyone in the middle east and we would already control the worlds oil supplies.. because we have the capacity to do this already and do not use it in that fashion.

The others that answered this questions are drawn to it just to throw out a hateful anti-bush remark. If they answer it with honesty, they couldn't say that he is a terrorist..

And the French dude that just answered..... if it wasn't for Americans, you would be speaking German... so don't forget it, french-dude.

2006-12-08 23:20:25 · answer #2 · answered by anw 1 · 2 1

he's caused a lot more death than osama and saddam

plus he's ruining the planet by not agreeing to reduce pollution

to anw: If USA had decided to join World War II a little earlier, France wouldn't have been defeated and the war would have ended much quicker saving millions of lives. If it wasn't for the French resistance during world war II, Germany would have found it easier to have beaten Britain and Russia. If the US hadn't joined the war, the Axes Powers would have conquered the whole of Europe, Africa and East Asia. How would the US have been able to compete with an economy that size?

2006-12-08 23:11:22 · answer #3 · answered by epbr123 5 · 1 2

Terrible but not a terrorist

2006-12-08 23:21:25 · answer #4 · answered by Bella Donna 5 · 0 1

Yes and the leader of a leading terrorist state. Iraq, Nicaragua, the list could go on.

2006-12-08 23:11:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

actually the same argument could be made for you jeapordizing the safety of the united states by subverting a valid attempt to keep al qaeda from our shores...now perhaps you can undestand the ridiculousness of this argument based on the contrary statement and move on ( i hope)

2006-12-08 23:22:39 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 1

Yes definitely. A stupid one at that as he fell right into Bin Laden's trap into causing fear and anarchy in the western world.

2006-12-08 23:12:10 · answer #7 · answered by patsy 5 · 1 1

you need to ask???lol yes yes yes yes yes/and blair,we are all terrorists is all down to the packaging,and state of mind

2006-12-08 23:37:11 · answer #8 · answered by archaeologia 6 · 0 1

Yes.
The greatest threat to world peace today is in fact the idiotic, drunken cowboy that Americans chose, not once but twice, to lead their country

2006-12-08 23:26:54 · answer #9 · answered by Big Ben 3 · 0 2

Yes, and the worst of them all.

He and his clique should be indicted for crimes against humanity.
I can hardly believe it when I see how many people are still falling for his hypocritical lies.

2006-12-08 23:18:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers