2006-12-08 23:08:56 · 4 answers · asked by Nicolas 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Not for murder, yes for lesser offenses.. Anyone who deliberately takes the life of another person forfeits their right to life. I think it was Daniel Webster who said " every unpunished murder reduces the security of the remaining citizens" (That wording might be slightly off, but that was the sentiment, and I agree with it)
2006-12-08 23:13:18 · answer #1 · answered by Tony B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NOT AT ALL. IT SHOULD BE AN EYE FOR AN EYE, TOOTH FOR TOOTH. IT MIGHT CALM DOWN OUR SOCIETY A BIT.CRIME IS GETTING OUT OF HAND IN OUR SOCIETY.COURTS ARE TOO LENIENT WITH SERIOUS CRIMINALS. IT SEEMS THAT THE CRIMINALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN THE VICTIMS.
2006-12-08 23:18:48 · answer #2 · answered by crane1951@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, we need to get that monster gene pool out of the human system.
2006-12-08 23:21:37 · answer #3 · answered by greylady 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no we should have more...all life termers should stop wasting tax payers money...
2006-12-08 23:20:00 · answer #4 · answered by turntable 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋