I mean at the time of the lies ,did he know for sure ,,,no wmd,s? or am i wrong and they pulled out all kinds of nasty weapons of mass destruction?
2006-12-08
22:50:44
·
12 answers
·
asked by
CIVILIAN
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
dorian,,,funny guy ,,,you send a letter to the white house,,,,it better say hail bush on it ,,,for your sake dude,,,im just talking here at yahoo,com....
2006-12-08
22:56:46 ·
update #1
tommy g,,i went to the web sight you poted,,i see nothing of 100% substance to weapons of mass destruction...if i could see threw the face of hilary clinton and kerry,i do not care what lies they say ...sorry but you did not answeer my question...
2006-12-09
08:51:22 ·
update #2
bottles ,,we found 1000000000,,,ya right.....budy even if you found one or two,,,IT STILL DON>>sorry ,you did not answeer the question...
2006-12-09
08:54:38 ·
update #3
a few of you say ,,,FOR THE OIL/////,,,that is quit possible,but that would 100% ,mean bush new early,of no weapons of mass destruction,,,,,we can not conclude that yet.
2006-12-09
08:58:10 ·
update #4
ok,three posibles listed here,that i like,,,rocky s ,,says if Iraq had wmd,s ,they would have used them,and on isreal too,I agree..also a personal attack on bush,i do not agree,bush is and was qualified for his post,,,good answeer but not what my mind says..no,du says blame it on his daddy ,ok could be,but unlikly,as bush is more of a loaner..stooner 38,,yes ,but ,,,hell is a judgment for god,not us...proud to be ya,,,you take the points,and the answeer as you and me both understand ....and can see the truth...cheers
2006-12-09
09:13:07 ·
update #5