English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean at the time of the lies ,did he know for sure ,,,no wmd,s? or am i wrong and they pulled out all kinds of nasty weapons of mass destruction?

2006-12-08 22:50:44 · 12 answers · asked by CIVILIAN 4 in Politics & Government Politics

dorian,,,funny guy ,,,you send a letter to the white house,,,,it better say hail bush on it ,,,for your sake dude,,,im just talking here at yahoo,com....

2006-12-08 22:56:46 · update #1

tommy g,,i went to the web sight you poted,,i see nothing of 100% substance to weapons of mass destruction...if i could see threw the face of hilary clinton and kerry,i do not care what lies they say ...sorry but you did not answeer my question...

2006-12-09 08:51:22 · update #2

bottles ,,we found 1000000000,,,ya right.....budy even if you found one or two,,,IT STILL DON>>sorry ,you did not answeer the question...

2006-12-09 08:54:38 · update #3

a few of you say ,,,FOR THE OIL/////,,,that is quit possible,but that would 100% ,mean bush new early,of no weapons of mass destruction,,,,,we can not conclude that yet.

2006-12-09 08:58:10 · update #4

ok,three posibles listed here,that i like,,,rocky s ,,says if Iraq had wmd,s ,they would have used them,and on isreal too,I agree..also a personal attack on bush,i do not agree,bush is and was qualified for his post,,,good answeer but not what my mind says..no,du says blame it on his daddy ,ok could be,but unlikly,as bush is more of a loaner..stooner 38,,yes ,but ,,,hell is a judgment for god,not us...proud to be ya,,,you take the points,and the answeer as you and me both understand ....and can see the truth...cheers

2006-12-09 09:13:07 · update #5

12 answers

You are wrong but that isn't going to change a thing, is it.

You'll continue playing this game because it is all you are good at.

2006-12-08 23:04:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The Bush administration deceived and lied the country into attacking Iraq, cynically exploiting the terrorism of 9/11 to launch a warfare lengthy on the time table of neocons which include Cheney and Wolfowitz. Bush's professional-warfare propaganda worked so properly that even right now more advantageous than 1/2 of all individuals wrongly believe that Saddam had WMDs and replaced into in the back of 9/11.The Bush administration produced thousands of fake information memories that were aired on television for the time of the country as information, constituting what the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, calls unlawful 'covert propaganda.'"

2016-11-30 08:40:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think he knew, if they had them they would have used them against Israel. Bush has a big ego and wanted all of us to think he is great. He did not know how to solve any of our other problems so he used a war to cover up the fact that he never should have been President. I could do a better job then him.

2006-12-08 22:59:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

Beside the reports that came from Clintons staff Englands' gov't
and so many other places and the fact that Saddam himself was a WMD unless you think it's ok that to kill hundreds of thousands of people.

2006-12-08 22:57:25 · answer #4 · answered by josh m 5 · 0 2

Of course he knew! The man has lied about almost EVERTHING since he stole the elections! But he will pay in HELL someday!

2006-12-08 23:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by stoner38 3 · 0 0

We found THOUSANDS of WMD's . The problem is that the liberals don't consider them WMD's , simply because they weren't made yesterday or the day before .
And you should really begin to READ the FACTS .
There is NO DOUBT that whatever WMDs Saddam could send into Syria. . ... .. . He did send into Syria. Read about the Bekka Valley and see what conclusion you draw from it !!!

2006-12-08 22:56:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I think he always knew there wasn't any such thing there. He had nothing to lose at the time for starting the war, which is why he did it. I guess he wasn't smart enough to think ahead a few years to the consequences of his actions when people find out that his war was built on lies. Wait.. I know that!

2006-12-08 22:54:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Please send an e-mail to the President c/o the White House Washington D.C.
Let us know the answer, for we all would like to know
"once and for all"

Edit:
Thanks, at least you caught my humor.
Seriously though, I know I will have to wait
for history to tell me, and that is if it is written at all
on this subject.

2006-12-08 22:53:29 · answer #8 · answered by dorianalways 4 · 1 0

He honestly believed that WMDs were there, because his Daddy, while directed of the CIA under Reagan, gave them to Hussein to fight the Iranians.

2006-12-08 23:01:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html?

Take the words of your own.Pull your head out of the sand.Or at least tell the truth.

2006-12-08 22:55:10 · answer #10 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers