She may be in more trouble than that if she keeps going out PERIOD. Who's watching the kids while she's out partying with Paris? Her mother? Think she better start worrying about Children's Services watching her along WITH the police.
2006-12-08 21:52:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by candozier 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about the rest of the world, but in my country, you can only be arrested for indecent exposure if you are on public frequented land. Been in a car or on private property is not actually considered been in public as you are on private owned land/vehicle.
2006-12-09 05:56:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by lolajanethompson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no evidence she flashed anybody.
This is just another series of shots a cameraman took of something that should never have been published.
I am sure you can find similar photos of most female celebrities.
2006-12-09 06:02:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by LORD Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
better not coz it could generate a lot more publicity which could do a favor for a lady having some degree of attention deficit disorder!
What a class act Britney!!!
2006-12-09 05:50:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probaly for the same reason that Lindeey Lohan was not .
2006-12-09 09:40:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by countrydancer30 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I argued about this subject last night. Anyone else would be charged
2006-12-09 06:01:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah i know she's a real *****...she exposes everything in her body,but nobody gives a **** u know...!
2006-12-09 05:52:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
PROBABLY BECAUSE PERVERTS LIKE US WOULD GO MENTAL BY FREEING HER FROM THE LOCAL COP SHOP.
2006-12-09 05:51:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because she is famous and most people wanted to see her trashy ***
2006-12-09 05:51:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by caron d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because she's famous and people want to see her stuff
2006-12-09 06:01:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by yukmouth 6
·
0⤊
0⤋