Do you (the Americans) approve the Indo-US nuclear deal.?

Answer 1

It's utterly stupid to sell the Indians nuke technology without requiring them to sign the non proliferaton treaty or agree to inspections at their 8 military nuclear installations. What does the US think they're going to do at the 8 sites? Perhaps the "strategy" is to allow India to develop into a regional superpower as a counterweight to China. That's also extremely foolish. Non proliferation as a policy worked for many years, why try something new, and which on its face is stupid and contrary to common sense.

Answer 2

I don't think I know enough of the details to give a position on the deal itself. But I would like to say what I like about the deal.
It shows a change in american nuclear foreign policy. Currently we are rooted in a system that seeks to stop only nuclear proliferation. It aims at the supply side of regimes. But I don't think that that is the way to stop nuclear proliferation. When something is on fire do you make everything around it wet so nothing else burns, but allow the fire to burn? No, you put out the fire too!
Australia has a nuclear foreign policy that aims at the creation side of nuclear proliferation and I think we are seeing a shift to that. With the american withdrawal from the anti-ballastic missile treaty we can note that nuclear deterrence is changing.

Answer 3

elementary words : NSG team will furnish Nuclear fuels to india for power generations yet india gained't make any nuke bomb or try nuke guns.also our nuke power stations are lower than nsg team.