Could someone who is so successful have done it by being stupid? Could someone so successful be as dumb as some of the people on Yahoo? Could someone so successful need advise from SENILE individuals who were afraid to go outside the green zone?
2006-12-08 20:58:19 · 9 answers · asked by FEVER 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Our President is one of the most accomplished individuals to hold the position, and anyone who would call him dumb or stupid are exactly that!!
2006-12-08 21:29:37 · answer #1 · answered by Smoky! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush as been certified stupid by the Iraq Study Group, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Gates, US military generals, moderate republicans, the people of Iraq, the United Nations, a majority of US voters, and the Vice President's own daughter.
The only people who continue to support the idiot are Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Rielly, sicophantic neocon apologists, and Al-Quaeda.
After a period of time longer than WWII, why is it still dangerous to go outside of a "green zone" in the first place, if Bush is so successful?...
2006-12-09 05:13:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Latest poll: only 17% of Americans believe Bush is doing the right thing in Iraq, so nearly every American is a loser by your criteria.
"Could someone who is so successful have done it by being stupid" Bush is not stupid, but he attained his office through his father's name and connections, not by dint of brain power or folksy charm. And that first election? One of the guys you call senile, James Baker III, "won" it for Bush in 2000 when he convinced the Supreme Court to stop the Florida recount.
2006-12-09 05:33:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
losers have very little else except their own fear of being discovered as stupid. The best way to keep a secret is to distract usually by provoking incidents or name calling. Their best hope is to bully or try and shout down someone with insults...
When dislike passes into hate then they become obsessed with their need to shout to the world that they are right that xxx is stupid /dumb ....with Losers its all about them...their needs
2006-12-09 05:06:52 · answer #4 · answered by cyansure 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I appreciate your question, but I think it extends to the bureaucrats who have also gotten a bad name. Many federal positions are exceedingly competitive and difficult to get.
I find that, as it regards politics, most people let someone else do the heavy lifting of editorializing for them and adopt an opinion. Worse, the epidemic of vitriol is so wide-spread that many are unwilling to acknowledge how flimsy their position is and fall back to straw man or ad hominum fallacies.
2006-12-09 05:07:01 · answer #5 · answered by Mark P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excellent question, some people need to call other people names in an effort to make themselves feel more important!
2006-12-09 05:11:55 · answer #6 · answered by SICKO 2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because I know how to read a book. he reads it upside down..ohhhh..he is a genius.
Did you know that the president can't pass the test that future teachers are required to take so they can be a bad paid teacher??.
2006-12-09 07:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by Ella dice 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a "winner" for being such a COMPLETE LOSER.
2006-12-09 05:09:38 · answer #8 · answered by Dave 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol. "all I know is that I know nothing" - Socrates.
2006-12-09 05:16:38 · answer #9 · answered by jazzman1127 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋