English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

No cause that would be giving the other sex criminals their jollies I say kill on the spot and save all the red tape.

2006-12-08 19:13:27 · answer #1 · answered by Obsidian © 5 · 1 0

depends. lets say you murdered someone for hurting someone in your family. would you deserve to be tortured? there are so many things to concider in deciding the fate of a criminal. i think child molesters should be tortured by sex criminals, for sure

2006-12-09 03:14:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, yes they should. But who will torture the sex criminals? And would they enjoy it?

2006-12-09 03:12:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

no we don't have state sponsered sex criminals

2006-12-09 03:13:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The new death penalty in Texas is to wake Chuck Norris up from a nap.

2006-12-09 03:13:45 · answer #5 · answered by Muff 2 · 1 0

No the state should not sponser crimes.

2006-12-09 03:14:01 · answer #6 · answered by Mim 7 · 0 0

No, even if they've killed, they're still human beings. No one deserves to be tortured.

2006-12-09 03:15:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think they should be tortured by the families they destroyed! im all for "an eye for an eye........"

2006-12-09 03:16:11 · answer #8 · answered by ~♥OzZ♥~™ 4 · 0 0

No, becuase it is wrong to torture anyone.

2006-12-09 03:22:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

let them rot in prison... that's torture enuf

2006-12-09 03:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by 2D1iLuV 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers