instead of an Aquarius?
I don't believe in this stuff, but I wonder what is the idea of someone who does believe in it. Say an unborn was expected Dec. 25 but they arrived a month later, making their sign Aquarius. Are they Aquarius because that is when they came out of the womb, or are they Capricorn coz they are overdue?
Hehe. Just for fun, folks.
2006-12-08 19:04:30 · 6 answers · asked by *babydoll* 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Horoscopes
No they wouldn't be. Your sign, and your chart have to do with where all the planets were when you were born and became your own self sufficient being.
2006-12-08 19:13:10 · answer #1 · answered by skachicah35 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the star sign is from when they actually appeared in the world. I think I would be more concerned about the fictitious person who didn't deliver till they were 10 months pregnant. 9 months is bad enough!
2006-12-09 03:07:36 · answer #2 · answered by auburn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No that doesn't matter, it's just when the baby is born, it doesn't have anything to do when you should have been born.
2006-12-09 03:07:07 · answer #3 · answered by Krisy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aquarius...when they were born. What if's don't count.
2006-12-09 03:11:57 · answer #4 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's when your born not the estimated date
2006-12-09 03:11:31 · answer #5 · answered by dark aran 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-12-09 03:06:21 · answer #6 · answered by dc5halcyon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋