English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

not if it's a good movie

2006-12-08 18:53:04 · answer #1 · answered by Obsidian © 5 · 1 0

There should be a law against most movies.

2006-12-09 02:58:00 · answer #2 · answered by Sartoris 5 · 0 0

It depends on the movie. Some need to be more than two hours long. Then again some are too long at 30 minutes.

2006-12-09 02:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by Joanne B 3 · 0 0

Actually, it depends. If the movie is very bad and it is over 2 hours, maybe there should. But if it is ok, no need.

2006-12-09 02:51:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There should be a low against boring and stupid movies, whether they are more or less than 2 hours.

2006-12-09 02:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by Chichou 4 · 0 0

There should be a law against asking idiotic questions.

2006-12-09 02:51:08 · answer #6 · answered by Muff 2 · 0 0

No.

Just think of the Godfather and Meet Joe Black and Good Will Hunting and Forrest Gump....

THOSE ARE CLASSICS!

2006-12-09 02:53:20 · answer #7 · answered by falzalnz 6 · 1 0

Nah. If it is a really good movie I don't mind it going long......

2006-12-09 02:49:31 · answer #8 · answered by YellaMelaDude 3 · 0 0

no, because some stories take longer to set up and resolve than others, and they are still enjoyable

2006-12-09 02:54:29 · answer #9 · answered by lamae85 2 · 0 0

no, i like to watch movies so its all good.

2006-12-09 02:47:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers