English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I see jobs that are targeted to Aboriginal Groups in Canada and if you are not a member as defined by the Employee Equity Act, you are automatically excluded if you do apply. (The legal basis for this flows from the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA), the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA), and the EEA) Other employers could be looking for a certain gender or age or ethnic group etc. Is this fair to those who ARE a part of these targeted groups? Or just unfair to those who could not apply by reason of their heritage or date of birth or genetics? Explain why you feel these hiring practices are fair or unfair. (specifically regarding these types of hiring; not out of country hiring practices)

2006-12-08 15:32:14 · 3 answers · asked by Cariad 5 in Business & Finance Careers & Employment

3 answers

Well I live in Alberta and we have a publicly-funded Catholic School Board that is financed by tax dollars but only employs teachers who can prove they are practicing Catholics. I understand the same system exists in Ontario. I believe it is the Ottawa School Board whose website reads, "Candidates must be practicing Catholics... proud to be an Equal Opportunity employer!"

I think this is sickening. Candidates are judged not on their teaching ability, experience and/or qualifications, but rather their religious practices. This kind of treatment would NEVER be allowed in the medical or legal fields, so why is it permitted in education? It frustrates me to know that I am relying on a person to perform a service, and they may hold that position not because of their merits but rather because of their ethnicity, religion or age.

2006-12-08 15:40:02 · answer #1 · answered by Jetgirly 6 · 1 0

I gotta say that understand thoroughly. i have were given a pal who replaced into stepping right into a convenience save minding his personal employer even as an uninsured, unlicensed unlawful motorist drove into him and the save he replaced into entering into. Now he ought to to bypass to the Dr. once a month to have fluid drained from his spinal cord. no human being will employ him even although he's prepared to signal a workman's comp waiver as a fashion to artwork. coverage organizations gained't insure him. he's compelled to be on social safe practices and by no skill even getting adequate to help his kinfolk a lot less pay his loan. He ought to a lot somewhat be operating. This state is a 'no fault' state and the guy who hit him and the save were given a $40 5 nice from a decide who suggested there replaced into not some thing else he ought to do.

2016-11-30 08:29:18 · answer #2 · answered by gnegy 4 · 0 0

Yes it seems that way depending on who you work for. Government jobs are probably more this way ironically. Also the Aboriginal or First Nations people can go to university and have it all paid for.

2006-12-08 16:16:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers