This question is for Tna fans only.Can you please answer me this one question.
Would Tna even exist If there was no wwe?Please answer with proof.Thank you.
2006-12-08 14:24:31 · 16 answers · asked by The wwe diva of 2010 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Looks like ballistik696 doesn't have an answer.Hmmmm,maybe because he knows I'm right.
-WWE 4 LIFE :)
2006-12-08 14:45:42 · update #1
Good point Harry A. Also I don't think Tna would exist because Wwe broulght wrestling to the spotlight.Tna would not have as many fans If Wwe wasn't arould.
2006-12-08 14:50:41 · update #2
They would still exist,but wrestling won't be that popular,if WWE wasn't around.There won't be a TNA,if there was no WCW.Let's face it,if there was no WWE,we won't even watch wrestling.WCW is good,but it won't be so popular,if WWE wasn't there.WWE's history is over 40 years old,when it was WWWF(not WWF),so it's one of the earliest wrestling promotion.
2006-12-08 19:24:34 · answer #1 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If what you mean is if TNA would exist if there was never a WWE, than I would have to say no. The ranks would probably rank now-1 or 2.WCW, 1 or 2.NWA, and 3.(original)ECW. What my perception is, is this: If WCW won the Monday Night WAR-TNA would exist and it would be made up of old WWF wrestlers and ECW wrestlers-after the end of ECW. For those who don't know, NWA owns TNA and the real question----- is if TNA would exist without Paul Heyman. If you saw the Rise and fall of ECW DVD, you'll know that after Heyman was fired by WCW and started Extreme(as opposed to Eastern) Championship Wrestling. A few years after(with the help of Shane Douglas) ending the promotion, NWA got back to work with a new six-sided promotion-Total Nonstop Action. If Heyman was never fired, there would most-likely still be Eastern Championship Wrestling. No TNA without Paul Heyman...Creepy!
2006-12-08 22:44:51 · answer #2 · answered by Harry A 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not. But TNA is by itself now. If it did not exist than there would be probably another wrestling company out there better than the WWE. TNA!
2006-12-09 07:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it would be around because TNA was founded by Jerry Jarrett a non wrestler though his son Jeff Jarrett was later on and did join WWF or E, WCW and now currently TNA. Jerry Jarrett had nothing to do with WWE, he formed TNA on his own with no help from Vince McMahon. I'm sorry you don't like wrestling but some of us actually like to see it, without mail cheerleaders and a white rapper named John!
2006-12-09 00:30:00 · answer #4 · answered by whatisthis 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it would because most of the people in it are Ex wcw wrestlers and ECW wrestlers the ones that came from the wwe would have worked for wcw and ecw and nwa and all the other feds that are out there...so if there was no wwe...tna could have been bigger then it is now but seems how there is a wwe...it looks like this question is pointless?...
just so you know i am a WWE fan...
2006-12-08 23:46:06 · answer #5 · answered by djice_04_prez 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your full of crap. Of course TNA would be around. TNA has way better management of thier wrestlers. The question is, if TNA were around when WWE was created, would there still be an WWE. TNA is the present and the future of wrestling.
2006-12-09 00:31:29 · answer #6 · answered by Kaleb T 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes, there would be a tna wrestling even without the wwe. you see future diva, tna is one of 50 wrestling federations which wrestle under the jurisdiction of the national wrestling alliance. so the talent pool of tna is deeper than the deepest ocean. while the wwe only has deep south wrestling and ohio valley wrestling. if you count the mexican and japanese feds, the nwa total reaches about 75-90. tna will be around for a long, long time unless vince offers billions to the brainchild of tna wrestling-jeff jarrett.
2006-12-08 22:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by crush_velvet2001 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Probably so.I like TNA better than WWE because they wrestle more.Instead of all the story lines that the WWE has.
2006-12-08 23:33:08 · answer #8 · answered by Me! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well if it weren't for Tna and other cuteness there wouldn't be anything to attract anybody to the barely visible wwe, or did I misunderstand the question?
.
2006-12-08 22:38:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES,
JEFF JARRETT(tna's owner) WAS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH WCW
(u probably dont what that is cuzz ur WWE4LIFE rite?????)
WCW WAS GOING DOWN ANYWAY U LOOK AT IT AND HE WAS GOING TO BE RELEASED FROM WCW SO YES TNA WOULD HAVE MOST LIKLEY EXISTED IF THERE WAS NO WWE
THE QUESTION SHOULD BE
WOULD TNA EXIST IF THERE WAS A WCW(not WWE)
2006-12-08 23:20:33 · answer #10 · answered by grant212021 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋