The world would be a better place, only because mankind would have destroyed any competition long ago.
What has kept us from going to war GLOBALLY has been large bodes of water.
Look at the larger landmasses that have large generational populations; Africa, South America, China.
Each one is embroiled in a "war" almost all the time. If you see a relatively long period of peace, it is only because "someone won'".
2006-12-08 14:01:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by wolf560 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I'm not sure what you mean, but...
If you're saying that the whole world would be land, then no. Dinstance is still distance, even if there aren't any oceans.
If you're saying that everyone would be on ONE land mass in the world, then still no. That would be crowded and disgusting and everyone would end up tearing each other's eyeballs out.
2006-12-08 21:47:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by :) 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. I think it would lead to things being boring. All the different races, cultures, ect..would all start mixing together and eventually we'd all be the same and diversity would be gone. I think diversity is good and we should keep it around, but that's just my opinion. Also, if we were just one big land mass, we'd have civil wars.
2006-12-08 21:48:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be ten times worse! Rats in a warren.
2006-12-08 21:47:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way baby, I wouldn't want to be near those nasty Americans
2006-12-08 23:24:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by tonytoucan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, it would be the same only in would take longer to travel
2006-12-08 21:48:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Erica K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if we bordered eachother many countries would be more prone to war. it would be hell if u think about it.
2006-12-08 21:49:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. Then we COULDN'T get away from each other.
2006-12-08 22:20:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Voodoid 7
·
0⤊
0⤋