The people who are on this website are speaking for themselves, embarassing themselves, and exposing themselves. There is nothing that makes this website not credible, because it simply provides the information, and allows the visitor to decide for themselves. One can view any politician saying what they said, in their own words, through video, and can come to their own conclusions. No one says youtube.com is not credible, and the same goes for this fine website. I support it 100%
2006-12-08 13:44:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Simple. Liberals hate being exposed. So they attempt to deflect criticism however they can -- including saying that your website is not credible... yes, even though you provide visual evidence. Loopy.
2006-12-08 14:02:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. The website is not well made. It looks messy, there are misspellings, and it does not present well on all browsers.
2. The sources and citation I saw in use are not sources I would put much trust in.
3. 'Visual evidence' is not proof. Anyone can have a bad day, and off interview, etc.
4. Extremism worries me. People who bash others the way this site does are not significantly better, in my mind, than those they bash. 'Judge not, lest ye be judged with the same measure'.
2006-12-08 14:01:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Madkins007 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
because many of the persons we are talking about are not effectual in the way you're wondering they're. They inherited a lot of money or their socio-economic upbringing enabled them to have the money and power they have. the right wing (a number of their stuff I trust) propogate those myths that billionaires somewhat made their money perfroming an major function for society and dealing troublesome and pullng themselves up with techniques from the bootstraps, etc. Civilized society ought to not exist without roofers and plumbers. it may, although, exist without funding and economic analysts and speculators who do not some thing yet take great element about an economic gadget honest those who somewhat contribute to the business gadget and to society have created. we do not favor those vast funding companies that squander billions of tax money and mess round with human beings's retirements and acquire each and each and every of the revenue. So why do they make so a lot more advantageous than roofers and plumbers? no human being is hostile to really effectual human beings, even millionaires, yet having billions of bucks is obscene. and they get it with techniques from taking benefit and thanks to their birthright. Liberals hence believe the established public might want to take this money decrease back that they have got been swindled out of to assist even teh taking section in container and a thanks to attempt it is progressive taxation. in case you word, honest wealthy, successul human beings do not merchandise to this kind of taxation and those forms of rules.
2016-11-30 08:23:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great website, buffman. Rosie has a long way to go before she is even close to the popularity she had when she had her own show. I don't think she will last long on The View. Since she "came out of the closet", she's changed. She's a bit of a nut these days!
2006-12-08 13:50:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
One racist liberal makes all liberals racist... Obviously. Track records with regard to civil rights movements definitely mean nothing. Who cares that it was liberals at the forefronts of all the great movements, while conservatives embraced Strom Thurmond and his friends?
2006-12-08 14:11:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by random6x7 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Here, abortion is simply murder.
Here, terrorists do not deserve any rights.
Here liberalism is the enemy, not Christians
Here, the liberal hate machine stops."
Wow... And you say liberals are racist, yet your own sight is declaring a way of life, i.e. liberalism, it's enemy. Is this site trying to raise arms against the government, and over throw America? Trying to change laws, like Roe v. Wade, and to force the American people into it's narrow minded views? I think you might be the terrorist here buddy.
2006-12-08 13:55:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jeff 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well, we won the elections. So, suffer, brother, suffer. In silence, if possible. You guys had your turn, and a royal mess you made of things, didn't you?
I looked at your website, but when I saw that idiot Hannity with that other idiot Coulter, I left very fast. Any material that uses the two of them to 'prove' anything is 'proving' nothing.
Suffer, brother, suffer.
2006-12-08 13:54:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It would possibly be more credible if both sides were exposed.
2006-12-08 14:16:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sinned2471 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're right... liberals can be VERY hateful.
But if you ignore that your own side can be just as hateful... then people can dismiss your site as biased. And frankly, I think if you're going to judge the other side you have to know what's wrong with your own and work to fix that too...
2006-12-08 13:44:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
2⤋