Most books written during this time period about this subject relied on the theory of the "happy Slave." They portrayed Slaves as being OK with their plight and not wanting to change. UTC was different, while it might have been a bit extreme, it was a rallying cry for abolitionist of the North.
2006-12-08 15:58:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sloan G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Abe Lincoln and Samuel Clemons the two thought that the attractiveness of the e book contributed a spark, of which there have been many. Uncle Toms Cabin replaced right into a checklist promoting e book, and it reviled a photo that maximum slave vendors did no longer decide for to alleviate. interior the north the literacy value replaced into very severe for the time and many the north had study the e book or knew related to the e book. So the reason replaced into nicely oftentimes going on. The slavery subject replaced right into a prepare that have been coming down the tracks because of fact the tip of the revolution. yet that e book placed the priority on all of us plate, in basic terms like observing CNN on the elevnth of September 2001.
2016-10-14 07:38:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Civil war was not primarily about slavery...that was only one issue...it was mostly about economics and political power. The only groups really excited about slavery at that point were the elites and the slave owners who had to try and make the system work. Many historians now believe that slavery as a source of labor would have collapsed within 20 years on its own...it had long ceased to be economically viable and was becoming socially unacceptable due to political arguments over states rights. Books like this one describe the condition but were not a cause.
2006-12-08 16:01:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uncle Tom's Cabin was a powerfully written (yet highly biased) work of fiction. It depicted the life of a good slave named Tom, and the trials and tribulations of his life. From his beginnings in the hands of a kind master to his untimely end at the hands of a cruel one. Abolitionists far and wide used the book as the basis for their arguments and may have been one of the reasons for John Brown's attack in 1859.
2006-12-08 18:00:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Robo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because it described how things really were with the slaves back then,and told of the wrongs that were being done,and got everyone stirred up.
2006-12-08 13:31:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tired Old Man 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It exaggerated the tensions between slave owners and slaves showing only one end of the slave/master spectrum.
2006-12-08 13:49:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Massi S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not as much as John Brown.
2006-12-08 13:39:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ummm...there were no movies back then. It's a book.
2006-12-08 13:48:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by banjuja58 4
·
0⤊
0⤋