English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Discuss.....

(statistic from US, although US stats are usually mirrored in uk)

2006-12-08 12:46:39 · 18 answers · asked by Im a killer 2 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

These are Government figures...What im trying to show is that Black people are far more racists than white people, yet white people are generally labelled as the racists it's a myth - you only have to watch fight videos off the web, ive lost count the number of clips ive seen where a gang of black people beat the sh1t out of one white guy..


There are a load of stats available on various websites..

another few of facts for you....

* Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Whites choose Blacks.

* The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF the time.

* In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites

2006-12-08 13:00:50 · update #1

heres one for a start, others to follow

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime

2006-12-08 13:17:56 · update #2

MissSexy : This is not a sterotype, and whites are not the biggest killers of blacks, blacks are...know your facts..

2006-12-08 13:18:53 · update #3

MissSexy : Also quoting rodney king etc does not change the statistics... This is what I am saying the white-on black crimes get highlighted by the media, yet not the other way round - it happens in the UK as well.. The figures for the Government back it up.

2006-12-08 13:20:42 · update #4

Rob B : my boy, where do you get your stats from, for a start theres 12% blacks in US not 10%, and the statistics Ive put up are not my made up ones, they are Government figures.. You are WAY more likely to be attacked by a black person if your white, than be attacked by a white person if your black - this is a fact in both the US and UK. In the UK 70% of race crimes are against white people - FACT..

2006-12-08 13:23:42 · update #5

*****************************
LOOK PPL, DONT WASTE YOUR TIME ARGUING WITH STATISTICS, THESE COME FROM THE GOVERNMENT.

WHAT IM LOOKING FOR IS YOUR OPINIONS ON WHY YOU THINK THAT THE PERCEPTION IS THAT WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST, YET THE FACTS SHOW THAT BLACKS ARE A MUCH BIGGER THREAT TO WHITE PEOPLE THAN THE OTHER WAY ROUND!!

YOUR THOUGHTS PLEASE....
*********************************************

2006-12-08 13:26:25 · update #6

joe b : No im not, the figures speak for themselves.

The assertion I make is that in reality Whites are the least racist of the races, and Blacks the most.

The statistics show this, I could isolate these figures to show just "Race Hate crimes", and the figures would show - as I've previously stated that 70% of race related crime is AGAINST white people.

So your point does not stand up - if we focus on the "70%" statistic, then it shows that in fact the reasoning is valid. And please dont attempt to interpret what point im making, the question I ask is straightforward - so just answer it..

2006-12-09 00:46:03 · update #7

18 answers

i do not see why all these people are against you. sorry mate but your asking a bunch of hypocritical losers a question. most people will never admit they are racist. but when the truth comes out they all are. almost every person i know is racist in someway or another to another individual of a different background/nationality.
one of my friends used the term 'chink' to refer to an asian person he had just lost out to in an auction. i felt disgusted as he is portraying himself as an honest individual of society and his job is in the pharmaceutical trade where he is in constant contact with people from various backgrounds. yet would he ever indentify one of his customers as'chinks'... i very much doubt it.

i think the facts and figures you are quoting may be correct but all it is doing is alienating black people and implicating them as the main scourge of society. i have nothing against a person if he is black. it depends on the individuals moral character/honesty/kindness and other factors that would adhere them to me. if they were corrupt individuals of an indecent character then i would hate them, but not because of the fact that they are black.
the racism is embedded deep inside all individuals. if you were white and you saw a black and a white man fighting, i am sure the majority of the times you would 'feel' for the white man, however this is the same if you were black, you would have an affection/association with someone of your own colour. its human nature and the day we accept it the better.
i really do not think you need to waste your time on these people. you ask valid questions which are appropriate. but however.... you do NOT recieve the response you desire.

2006-12-09 10:27:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

White ppl are precived as racist sometimes because of your history. Even though there were white ppl who didn't agree with the racist stuff other white ppl did, they weren't the majority. (sadly).
----------------------------------
Your first citation doesn't prove what you're trying to say. This is what your first page says,
"An observed correlation between race and crime has been noted in a number of countries. This has prompted controversy regarding the possible causes and social effects, and regarding which actions should consequently be taken. In the United States, blacks are more likely than whites to be convicted of violent crime who are in turn more likely to be convicted of violent crime than Asians are. Statistics have also shown that in the United States, a black person is more likely to be arrested for a particular crime than a white person is for the exact same crime."
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime)

This has nothing to do with black ppl assulting white ppl more or white ppl assulting black ppl more. It's about who's more likely to be convicted of the same crime!
-------------------------------
Um... you say that like there are barely any racist white ppl. I agree there are some racist black ppl...just like there are some racist black ppl. Is one more racist than the other? I don't think so. Have you ever seen a group of white cops beat the crap out of one black dude who didn't have anything and wasn't doing anything wrong? Clips like that, prolly, aren't on the internet cause an extra person would have to have been there to film the injustice. (not saying the white person being beat up wasn't an injustice) Clips like that are found on the news, by chance.

2006-12-08 12:50:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

That is a sterotype. The government lies to people. And if you think that blacks are more racist than whites that's your opinon but I don't think that is true considering over all whites have killed more blacks in the united states than any other race. So i'm guessing you don't remember the Rodney King beating? or lets go with a more recent one that happened in New York...A BLACK man, the night before his WEDDING, was beaten to death and shot by WHITE police officers. He didn't have a weapon of any kind. And a WHITE police officer RELOADED his gun and still continued shooting even after the victim was down on the ground bleeding to death and in no way capable of defending himself.

2006-12-08 13:07:16 · answer #3 · answered by MissSexy 2 · 5 3

It looks like you're trying to substantiate the popular idea that whites are more prone to racial prejudice is wrong;

and that you're trying to substantiate this claim using certain statistics on interracial violence.

In some sense, your reasoning rests on the assumption:

"These acts of violence were interracial acts of violence.
Therefore, they must have been racially motivated,"

Which is false.

I think you can reasonably argue that black people are more racially prejudice than white people, but these statistics show nothing to that end.

2006-12-08 15:33:59 · answer #4 · answered by joe b 1 · 2 2

Wrong. The likelihood that one person will attack another is based on lots of things, but it is very seldom CAUSED by race - which is the implication of your claim.

Whites are 80% of the population of the US. If someone were to mug someone at random, there's an 80% chance that victim would be white and a 10% chance that victim would be black. But the odds of any individual person - black or white - being mugged would be the same.

So if 2 muggers go about mugging people to rob them, all other things being equal, 80% of victims will be white. So of course the odds of a white person being mugged relative to a black person being mugged should be higher. (But in point of fact and despite the implication of your post, blacks are far, far more likely to be victims of violent crime than whites.)

But you've tried to expand that statistic and use it to predict the behavior of every black and white person based on race. But of course, you can't pick a person out at random based on their race and claim that you know how "likely" they are to mug someone because the vast majority of people never mug anyone. A distinct minority of people of every race commit most of the violent crime. Your claims hides that fact and leads to a flawed conclusion.

Also, you're assuming that whenever someone black attacks someone white, it's racially motivated. Most crime is motivated by a desire to get something - usually money. Given that whites tend to have more money that blacks, is it surprising that whites are robbed more often? That's like arguing that banks get robbed because people hate banks.

2006-12-08 13:08:43 · answer #5 · answered by Rob B 4 · 6 3

That is so true. Yet an astounding percentage of both black and white people refuse to believe it. Even though it is well documented in the FBI and the U.S. Dept. of Justice crime statistics.

2017-01-22 03:58:53 · answer #6 · answered by Al 2 · 0 0

No, they weren't precise. i think of the completed thought of racial purity is rubbish. If human beings weren't meant to have the skill to (no longer the comparable as had to), blend, then it does not be achievable. yet if you consider that human beings can (and do) blend races, for sure we've been meant to might desire to it come. yet we are each and all the comparable race, human, in basic terms distinctive cultures and ameliorations of epidermis colours. White human beings might desire to have prevalent their biracial opposite numbers because of fact whether or no longer they provide the effect of being it or no longer, they're as white as they're black, whether its no longer on the exterior. Thats why at present white human beings whinge approximately Obama and different mulattos figuring out as black, nicely all of it comes right down to historical past and the gruesome factor referred to as racism. If in straightforward terms those comparable human beings some time past then ought to determine how they no longer in straightforward terms harm different races yet their very own destiny generations besides I doubt they had make the comparable possibilities. you're precise, the white race isn't unified because of fact they're run with the help of a set of rich elitists that for the duration of straightforward terms look out for themselves, and white American custom has no unified custom. as quickly as Europeans come to u . s . of america they lose their historical past and their custom. maximum white human beings do no longer additionally know the place their grandparents or super-grandparents got here from no longer to point even attempt to analyze their eu roots and cultures. rather they chase after the media-pushed American custom which glorifies money and separation, each and all the whilst bowing down on the ft and idolizing the elitists that look down on them as much as they provide the effect of being down on adverse Anglos, non-white and non-Anglo white human beings. All i will say replaced into the completed employer of slavery created a huge mess that u . s . of america continues to be extremely cleansing up at present and harm extra human beings than meant. And the basis? no longer racism (initially), yet profiteering and money. is going to coach you precise? And confident what you wrote has validity and replaced into a fascinating attitude.

2016-10-14 07:34:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Just because you think a certain race is more proned to fight than another doesn't mean the person who's fighting is a racist.Just.... ready and ain't scared to fight.Who cares what colors are the child rapists when its still bad anyway..

2006-12-08 14:02:37 · answer #8 · answered by Nicholais S 6 · 1 3

You should really cite your sources for demographic statistics like this, because you know, 78.998% of all stats are made up on the spot.

2006-12-08 12:50:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

I would agree,but last time I did a gal sent me a message saying I was racist because I agreed that Detroit had a lot of crime,because of blacks. so--- oh heck I will agree anyway!!

2006-12-08 12:56:49 · answer #10 · answered by Tired Old Man 7 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers