the kids on here just keep proving me right?

Question

they say that normal people like penis jokes and naked fat guys,what the hell does that have to do with wrestling.this just proves what I have been saying,the new so called fans know nothing about wrestling.you don't see tna doing this crap,because tna care about wrestling,like it should.you kids can talk bad about tna all you want but it doesn't change that fact that tna is on the rise.

Answer 1

we could kill tna some kid said nobody on wwe could beat tna but people beat kurt on wwe but not even joe can beat him so wwe is better so u dont think nobody on wwe can beat tna ill name some who can undertaker,kane,just those 2 could destroy tna.

Answer 2

Yea TNA does focus on wrestling more than WWE. But TNA will more than likely die within a few years because the money isn't there. I thought WWE would step away from the "entertainment" aspect when TNA went to Spike. But look at WWE they could care less because its not exactly a threat and never will be. I like wrestling but I can't like WWE or TNA because they are both hard to watch because they are so predictable.

Answer 3

Have you talked to every kid on this site? And what exactly is your definition of kid?
I for one don't think penis jokes and naked, fat guys are that funny. It has nothing to do with wrestling. That's why it's called wrestling ENTERTAINMENT.
How much do you want the newer fans to know? It's mostly about entertaining now, that's why they got into it.
You can't compare TNA to the WWE, because when you talk about TNA, you talk about wrestling, when the WWE is more about entertainment.
Let TNA be on the rise. WWE is already the top brand and has been for years.

EDIT: before you talk about the mentality of someone else make sure your writing demonstrates that you've passed 2nd grade english and grammar.

Answer 4

Jacj is a moron. The only reason Kurt Angle lost in the WWE (most of the time) was because he was told to. Do you people really think that people like John Cena and Batista could actually beat Angle in a real wrestling match? If you do you need to check yourself into a psychiatric ward immediately and have a test to see how many brain cells you still have left. The reason Vince is doing these things is because the idiot has fired all of his good writers and is now backed up into a corner, and he is trying desperately to appeal to the new generation of fans (20 and under), but the problem is that nobody knows what they are about. It is not like my generation (Generation X) where it is clear what we are about (that was why the attitude era did so well), but with this generation they don't seem to have any qualities that stand out except that they want to be like Generation X. So what does Vince, in his infinite (hah!) wisdom, do when he is backed up into a corner? Well he does what he always does when he is in that situation, he gives the titles to the big steroid-ed up guys (like Batista) because he thinks that appeals to people even though most of these guys (again, like Batista) are so limited in the ring, especially because they didn't start wrestling until they were about 25 (Roidtista was a damn bouncer before he started wrestling), that they look like crap except for the power moves. Also he will make new wrestlers seem and act like retired wrestlers, like how Cena is like The Rock although nowhere near Rock's level, or they copy off another wrestler in a different company, like their dumbass idea now with Umaga and the fact but he is nothing but a copy of Samoa Joe and the reality is that Joe can wrestle and Umaga is garbage, and Vince does this because he much rather promote and push people than to just see who is best by watching them preform, because if he did that people like Chris Benoit, Edge, Randy Orton, Chavo Guerrero, RVD, and so on would always have the Titles and people like Batista would be mid-carders, but anybody who has been watching WWE for ten years knows Vince has to much of an ego to do that because he likes to think he is God's gift to wrestling and he can make anybody a legend in wrestling so that he can feed his ego. Also, Vince will bring back old story-lines or so forth, like what he is doing with DX, but the problem is that Triple H and Shawn Michaels aren't like what they were back then and plus they are ruining the legacy of what DX was to the people who watched them before, not to mention that if they are trying to appeal to the youth of the fans they should probably use people who aren't either already are or is nearing 40. It is times like this that I realize that I am not a part of the youth anymore (I am 23), because situations like this when these preteen fans ***** to us that we don't know what we are talking about, call us gay or idiots because they can't come up with anything else, or when they act like what happens on the WWE shows are real (like when they were pissed at what Rated RKO did to Ric Flair) is so ******* stupid that it makes me want to bang my head on a table to distract myself from the pain of reading these peoples remarks! So yes they are proving you right! I hope that answers your question.

This message was written by Tom Cochran, one of the smarter people on this site.

Answer 5

U keeping making n *** of your self more more each timw stop wasting 5 points and go get some help we dont have to like what u like we have rights to like what we want and we are not idiots by the way TNA IS THE NEW WCW AND IT IS HEADING IN THE DIRRECTION OF WCW AND IT WILL DIE LIKE WCW AND WWE WINS AGAIN I GUES HISTORY DOES REPEAT ITSELF HUH GO DO YOUr Homwork little kid

Answer 6

yeah ur right their on the rise until Mr.McMahon doesn't want them anymore then he'll just bye them out and crush them. Same thing he did with ECW WCW and soon TNA.

Answer 7

dude raw is way better than tna they have john cena dx and a lot of contiversey including the hardys lets see tna top that ecw is way beter than them both thanks to bobby lashley

Answer 8

Tom Cochran is right. Choose his answer! and jacj is probably under 12 years old.

Answer 9

Honey when you write a sentence first you have to write the subject followed by the predicate, and please lets not forget the verb. You lost me for a second. I had to read this twice in order to understand your point.

Answer 10

At least there are still a few of us that know what it's really about