English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

With all the crimes they committed, White water, Vince Foster, Monica, and all the other graft, payoffs for Pardons and Bimbo eruptions, would those constitute High Crimes and Misdemeanors?

2006-12-08 11:13:00 · 14 answers · asked by Smoky! 4 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

I'd be willing to let it go if the liberals weren't trying to put them back in the whitehouse.

2006-12-08 11:41:45 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2 3

They found no wrongdoing regarding whitewater. Why do you assume they had participated in Vince Foster's death? 10 bucks says you couldn't cite a source to support your false claim. Bimbo eruptions? whatever that means. There were no payoffs for pardons either. again, you can't cite any of your claims. obviously you're still upset about the election last month and the fact that Clinton had incredibly high approval ratings, whereas, bush is floating around the 30s. upset aren't ya?

2006-12-08 19:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Republicans spent $65 million to impeach Bill Clinton for lying to Congress about some twisted real estate deals, and about an extra-marital indiscretion involving another consensual adult.

Republicans have NOT spent one dime trying to impeach George W. Bush for lying to Congress about his reasons for illegally and unconstitutionally invading another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked, or attacked the U.S.A.

Whatever Bill and Hillary done while in the White House were not matters involving national security. George W. Bush, on the other hand, has:
a) Taken federal law into his own hands without regard to the United States Constitution;
b) Violated the terms of the Geneva Convention;
c) Lied to Congress and the American people about 'weapons of mass destruction' as his reason for invading Iraq;
d) Condoned - or, at best, ignored - the verbal, physical, and sexual abuse of 'detainees' being held without representation or without charges being filed;
e) Established 'secret' CIA prisons;
f) Declared 'war' (that's the job of Congress);
g) Killed at least 655,000 Iraqi citizens and 2,800 U.S. soldiers.

For all these impeachable offenses and dastardly crimes against humanity, Bush and his administration, and all 535 members of the most contemptible, arrogant, incompetent, evil, cowardly, greedy, corrupt Congress in U.S. history should be tried in an international tribunal, and - if convicted - should hang right alongside Saddam Hussein.

Bush and his cronies invaded Iraq for one primary reason: OIL.
Of the five major mass murders in the past 75 years, consider this:
1. Joseph Stalin killed 10,000,000 of his own countrymen and died in his sleep, having never faced justice;
2. Adolph Hitler killed 6,000,000 'undesirables' and committed suicide instead of facing justice;
3. Idi Amin killed 2,000,000 people in Uganda and retired in luxurious exile without every facing justice;
4. George Bush has killed almost 675,000 people (so far) and will probably never be held accountable for his murders;
5. Saddam Hussein, on the other hand, was sentenced to die for killing 148 people in a small Iraqi village. He is the only one of these five slaughterers ever to face a court of law.

-RKO-

2006-12-08 19:32:16 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3 1

They paid the Starr Commission over $42 million and they couldn't come up with anything. Keep staying in the nineties and you'll hand us the presidency in 2008 on a silver platter.

2006-12-08 19:41:22 · answer #4 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0 1

As Truth Seeker explained, the exorbitant witch-hunt targeting the Clintons was a sham and a failure.

For instance you give "White water [sic]" as an example of a crime. Millions of dollars were spent investigating the Whitewater affair. So tell me, what was the finding? Did anyone find evidence of a crime? What was it? Please be specific.

2006-12-08 19:30:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You morons spent 5 years and in excess of $30 million trying to find evidence in the Whitewater case. You didn't. Give it up. With that amount of money and time, I could put the Pope in prison. Even the so called "lie" shouldn't have been a reason to impeach. Perjury should be when it is pertinent to the case. Monica was not pertinent to the Whitewater case. Go start another witch hunt somewhere else.

2006-12-08 19:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 5 4

Does living in the past enable you to forget about the problems today?
What you are suggesting is not even legally possible.

2006-12-08 19:33:37 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2 0

Been there done that No conviction for Bill, no indictments for Hillary. Not that they didn't try. So, seriously, don't you think it's time to move on?

2006-12-08 19:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yeah, I'll take a monica scandal every day if we can undo the stupid Bush War in Iraq.

2006-12-08 19:27:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I don't think that such a statute exists. Bribery, fraud, etc maybe, but not "Crimes against America".

2006-12-08 19:15:32 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers