English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-08 10:44:53 · 12 answers · asked by munyori 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting Newborn & Baby

12 answers

Um... What makes you think that you need to know the answer to that question?

2006-12-08 10:52:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I heard her first son had to have is circumcision re-done because not enough of the foreskin was removed or Britney didn't like the results of the circumcision. I'm sure her second son got circumcised too.

2006-12-11 01:21:16 · answer #2 · answered by Tyler W 1 · 1 2

Honestly, I dont care what Britney Spears does or did.

2006-12-08 19:03:32 · answer #3 · answered by Kristin Pregnant with #4 6 · 0 1

Who knows!? Why does it matter? Is this what you're basing YOUR decision on? What Britney Spears does with HER kids? Yikes.

Circumcision is on the decline now. The AAP said that it's not necessary anymore... it's NOT any cleaner and there really is no reason to do it. There are actually benefits to having foreskin... that's why boys are born with them. Do your research. Educate yourself.

2006-12-08 18:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 9 1

YES she did, as any other caring and responsible mother.

Is it NOT true that the AAP (American Academy of Paediatrics) does not recommend circumcision. They simply say they leave the decision to parents. But recently, and specially after the New Zealand study, the AAP has been discussing if it may be necessary to change their policy and recommend circumcision to all newborns as they used to do, so in the future we may see that the AAP advocates again circumcision.
Have a look at: http://www.baby-health.net/articles/381.html

CIRCUMCISION IS VERY BENEFICIAL, its cleaner and several research bodies have concluded that circumcised men have less risk of contracting STD's such as AIDS-HIV or herpes.

Circumcision is an easy and nowadays *painless* procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.
Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.

2006-12-10 12:33:07 · answer #5 · answered by Scuba 3 · 0 6

I didn't heard anything like that. I think if she really did (not herself of course :) ), everybody would know by now.
Don't you think so?

2006-12-08 18:53:51 · answer #6 · answered by Svetlana G 3 · 0 0

I haven't heard one way or the other. On the other hand, most American males are circumcised, so the probability is high.

2006-12-08 18:49:37 · answer #7 · answered by P. M 5 · 0 6

Probably not herself.

2006-12-08 18:47:21 · answer #8 · answered by j 3 · 1 0

That is a dumbass question.

2006-12-08 18:48:44 · answer #9 · answered by Rockfish 2 · 3 0

ewe, wierd question.

2006-12-08 18:54:22 · answer #10 · answered by Honeypai 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers