And if such a law were passed, how could it be enforced?
2006-12-08 10:40:14 · 28 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Nope
2006-12-08 10:41:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nope - it's the flipside of the pro-choie argument - if a woman has the right to decide what happens to her body when she's pregnant, she has the right to decide what happens to it when she's not too.
And how do you enforce such a law? Well, you'd be able to do that by upping the bureaucracy quotient - full investigation of circumstances, leading to an unappealable decision. You'd have to re-apply in the event of a change in circumstances - eg if you suddenly "found" heterosexuality or got a male. It'd be the thin end of a very dangerous wedge of legislation and I'd be out on the streets with banners way before it got passed, but the state will always find a way to enforce its laws, even if they're morally dubious.
2006-12-08 22:24:14 · answer #2 · answered by mdfalco71 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it should be illegal for insemination BUT I do think that when a person does choose this route to become pregnant with a man's child they should be required to waive any right to requiring the biological father to pay for such child. It has been done...
2006-12-08 10:50:04 · answer #3 · answered by Yeah you know N 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Technical factors and larger techniques about donor insemination, which include studies both one in each and every of human beings that chosen to apply donor insemination and of youngsters born as hence donor insemination, see the source lower than.
2016-11-30 08:14:23 · answer #4 · answered by jaffar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say good luck passing that law, it will never fly. Gay people are humans just like everyone else. Now I don't think illegals should get artificially inseminated, but that is another can of worms.
2006-12-08 10:42:58 · answer #5 · answered by I do what I want.. 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No, it should not be illegal. Any woman who chooses to have a child through insemination should be allowed that right, even lesbians. Denying them the right to be mothers only because of their sexual status is wrong.
2006-12-08 10:43:48 · answer #6 · answered by Danelle 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. This is America, not China. If a woman wants to be artifically inseminated then she should be able to do so. Also, if someone goes through the difficult road of insemintation this person is serious about wanting a child and wanting to be a parent.
2006-12-08 10:43:59 · answer #7 · answered by Mrs. Bass 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
NO!
I would think such a law could not be possible - the question is chilling.
Best wishes,
pup
2006-12-08 10:43:07 · answer #8 · answered by . 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I dont feel it would be right to keep a child from even having one parent because if there is love there the child would be fine , there are children out there that dont even get noticed by two parents To me if someone wanted to do this they must have a lot of love to give .
2006-12-08 10:54:31 · answer #9 · answered by janice a 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No way...why should single women or lesbians be discriminated against. Lets say a women gets pregnant by her spouse or boyfriend and he ends up leaving, what do you do then take that ladies baby away cause she is now single??? I dont think so. By the way Merry Christmas!!!
2006-12-08 10:46:40 · answer #10 · answered by memosgirl03 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Not unless they make it illegal for mothers and fathers to divorce or separate. This is the most private of all decisions: when and whether to have children. As a country, we can't and should not, legislate that personal act.
2006-12-08 10:44:37 · answer #11 · answered by swarr2001 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋