Reference the 2004 election. Wouldn't it actually take a degree of competence to fix an election?
Judging by the way the last six years have gone, I don't think they have the competence to accomplish this. Maybe they're simply corrupt?
2006-12-08 10:16:50 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There's plenty of evidence that they fixed the election. Most notably, exit polls didn't match the official results. In every precinct where there was a mismatch, the difference favored Bush. They did the same thing in the 2006 elections, it just wasn't enough.
Fixing an election is much easier than, say, pacifying Iraq.
2006-12-08 10:29:31 · answer #1 · answered by rainfingers 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I seem to recall some high-ranking, loud-mouthed Republican stating in public that he would personally "deliver" the state of Ohio to Bush a year before the 2004 election. If you don't believe that it just might be possible, I feel sorry for you...
2006-12-08 11:30:27 · answer #2 · answered by correrafan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe Bush fixed the election. If that's so why did they loose this election. Or was the fix in by the Dem's this time. Lot of people on this question sure are gullible to think that only one party is guilt of putting the fix in.
2006-12-08 10:34:55 · answer #3 · answered by John S 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would be very sad if our (America) election were fixed. Then we would be no better the other dictator run countries. The only thing that tells me know is both parties are able to get into office. Does that mean both parties put the fix in?
2006-12-08 10:26:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush doesn't have the competence, but Dick Cheney might, and Karl Rove definitely could. Some people are competent in some areas (i.e. fixing elections) and lousy in others (i.e. war policy). And YES, I believe that election was fixed (I KNOW the first one was...)
2006-12-08 10:31:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Good grief. Do you realize how many people would have to keep their mouths shut for something like that to occur? Like him or not, the man won 2 elections.
Rhonda - you're "argument" is not valid at all. For Bush to have "stolen" the 2000 election, Republicans would have had to know that it would all come down to Florida, and stacked the Supreme Court.
2006-12-08 10:26:11 · answer #6 · answered by Jadis 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
All of the simple minded single visioned Bush bashers would like to think so. When you look at the issues only a moron would come down on the Liberal side.
2006-12-08 10:31:39 · answer #7 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
There's no chance that election was fair and square. The administration is corrupt to the bone.
I don't believe in any conspiracy theories on it, but it's a fact that kerry and Bu$h were also part of the same secret society. It doesn't add up and it's not fair that america should have this kind of choice of politicians.
2006-12-08 10:20:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
No one fixed the election. Every election since I can remember one side said the other side fixed the election.
2006-12-08 10:20:49 · answer #9 · answered by Texan 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
If Bush had the ability to "fix" elections why did his party lose the last one?
2006-12-08 10:23:19 · answer #10 · answered by robertbdiver 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋