2006-12-08 09:47:33 · 9 answers · asked by tere yaad 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
NO-different eras, Ponting has played more tests in a shorter time than Bradman.
Did you hear about the Pommie Batsman who was overconfident? He was putting on sunscreen before he went into bat!
2006-12-08 09:52:16 · answer #1 · answered by graeme1944 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You just never know I guess. Sir Donald was on of the most graceful player to watch, with his cover drives racing to the boundary and his awesome average. Ponting is a rugged natural cricketer that oozes class and determination.
Couldn't compare though. Different time and era. Would be nice though to see them in the same team.
2006-12-08 23:11:33 · answer #2 · answered by jazza 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no donald bradmans better than ricky
2006-12-09 00:03:33 · answer #3 · answered by dx d 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO No NO!!! Pointing could never be as the standard of bowline today i not what it use to be
i dont Pointing could manage the westindies of the 70s and 80s
2006-12-08 19:13:48 · answer #4 · answered by maxie md 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is impossible to compare the 2 because the game is now completely different and the workload now alot heavier
2006-12-08 19:12:57 · answer #5 · answered by whay i lost my ?s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way. ricky is not better. my vote is for bradman
2006-12-09 05:34:23 · answer #6 · answered by rinu n 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not better, but the next best.
2006-12-09 04:51:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not yet.
2006-12-09 01:37:07 · answer #8 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-12-09 01:59:10 · answer #9 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋