protected you from terrorism, and the US said everybody had to get one by law, would you rebel? or except?
and don't say he couldn't do that. the administartion has already said that if it protects americans they'll do whatever. like takeing away habeas corpus or the patriot act.
2006-12-08 09:45:00 · 12 answers · asked by sapace monkey 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i'm asking what if, if you answer, please include if you would except or rebel,
simple question
2006-12-08 09:46:02 · update #1
your not poloticains, so please give me straight answers
2006-12-08 09:46:38 · update #2
I wouldn't want such a device installed in my body. I suppose that if you offered it as a service and charged for it instead of requiring it by law, many would actually pay money for the privelage of being tracked. They already have a chip for pets. It is a very short step to have one for people. Come to think of it, that might be a good way to lower taxes. Have the government sell it as a service to people. You can stop laughing now.
2006-12-08 10:18:20 · answer #1 · answered by Jack 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, the government is really pushing it now. Did you guys know that there are "Black Boxes" already installed into your vehicles? The automakers say its a program to tell airbags when to go off, but it also tracks and records your car, like Black Box in the planes. The whole terrorist idea is to scare the population into submission. By the way, where are those WMDs in Iraq?
2006-12-08 09:55:17 · answer #2 · answered by Snag 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i'm not someones resources that desires accounting for each minute. i does not go with like that for my toddlers. interior the grand scheme of issues - the technologies ought to finally be used detrimentally. I understand the point of having the ability to discover loved ones IF, I nonetheless believe it must be more advantageous volatile to be subjected to "plausible" around the clock detection. route, i have not lost a loved one or toddler. My opinion ought to replace if my situations replace. this is only my element of not 'making' my toddlers get implanted!
2016-11-30 08:12:35 · answer #3 · answered by jaffar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no I wouldn't get the chip. That just takes away my whole right to privacy! the government doesn't need to know where I am at all times of the day or night. They have no right to know if I am going out of state for some reason or even going out of town to visit family.
2006-12-08 09:55:20 · answer #4 · answered by kerrberr95 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to think I'd rebel. But if the govt is gonna arrest me or kill me or something...I'd probably accept. I'd pray about that for a long time though. Because I'd love to rebel against that; but hey, I'm a wuss.
2006-12-08 09:55:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rebel for the fact that I was told I HAD to . I`ve always kinda been like that.
2006-12-08 10:06:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather die than allow the government to insert a tracking chip in my body.
2006-12-08 09:47:35 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would like to have a tracking chip, then i could call them and find out where i am when i get lost!!
2006-12-08 09:50:57 · answer #8 · answered by FEVER 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) It won't happen.
2) It wouldn't work.
3) I wouldn't do it.
2006-12-08 10:12:00 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
read "Revelation" in the Bible
all we need is a chip to purchase things in our own hand. No more remembering our ATM's numbers, but our entire account is in our hand
2006-12-08 09:49:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋