2006-12-08 09:41:20 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. The United States of Bush
How bout the George Bush experience featuring the United States
2006-12-08 09:42:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
No, Bush mainly won in rural areas, and the republican party gonna have more to the center, and Mccain, Gulitani know that. America is 300 millions it like having 3 countres in one nation. The Northeast is socially and politcally different from the South, and the you have the west coast that is complety different from both Midwest, and the north east. The media does not explain America in the right context at times. I live in Minnesota that is culutrally close to Wisconsin and Canada than the state of Alabama and Texas on a quite a few poltical issuses. Its poor assumption to rename the USA. Bush is not well liked on the west coast, and urban areas in the northeast. As a Howard Dean probadly not too well liked in deep bible belt of the south.
2006-12-08 17:50:03 · answer #2 · answered by ram456456 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't liberals realize they are just killing any chance of winning 2008. I am not a fan of Bush but with all of the bashing and complaining and some of the freaks tossing money at dems now I don't think I could vote for any of their candidates for President. they would have us all smoking weed, collecting government checks and complaining about how hard we have it. I would really love to see the Democrats I used to feel I belonged with come back to power. Both our major parites are under the control of their own wing zealots with no concept of reality. While the other 80% of America suffers.
2006-12-08 18:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by archkarat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
WE should rename the USA
United Cowardly America Haters Democrat States
2006-12-08 17:45:32 · answer #4 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Divided States of America
2006-12-08 17:46:35 · answer #5 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. And let's make our flag red. Ohh - we could put this black cross on it, but we'll rotate it 45 degrees, yeah. I know, then we can bend each leg of the cross about half-way with all the legs pointing the same way. Yeah that's it. It'll be just perfect. All of us white folks, only enough coloreds to serve us our food and drinks, maybe for a little entertainment after the women folk go to bed. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Nice question, Nazi.
2006-12-08 18:01:16 · answer #6 · answered by Garth Rocket 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about "George W. Bush Presents, The United States of America"?
2006-12-08 17:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
so were changing states to bush's? The bush's arent the first family to have a lot of say in politics. think of john adams and john quincy adams, teddy roosevelt and FDR, the kennedy's, benjamin harrison a nd william henry harrison. we didnt change the name of our country for any of them
2006-12-08 18:16:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
how about him, his illegal immigrant hiring corrupt friends,all republicans who believe his lies,and all his big business buddies move to iraq and name it after them. Being as the mission is accomplished and it is a peaceful place to live.He can go and have all the oil he wants so america can get on the right path and mass produce a more efficient energy source.So american money doesnt go to all his middle eastern friends......
2006-12-08 18:22:22 · answer #9 · answered by WHEREISJUSTICE 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Couldnt one say that means a bunch of p ussies standing together? I would rethink that name.
2006-12-08 17:50:00 · answer #10 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋