English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After all there are far fewer ruling class, then the vast majority just getting by! Don't buy into these narrow minded people who say oh you can't come after my money. They can keep thier money its just going to have a fair way of getting distributed under majority rule & control, instead of unfair wealthy minority control.

2006-12-08 08:45:07 · 5 answers · asked by bulabate 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

5 answers

The ruling class always has the military.

I've never understood why more liberals don't own guns. It seems a no-brainer.

2006-12-08 10:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1 0

Poverty is a subject measure what is minimum amount of food can get by with. What is minimum amount of housing they can get by with? Happiness in life come from interacting socially with the community at large. Not everyone is ambitious to the point of sacrificing family, Friends, social gatherings for the pursuit of more money. In the last 30 years more Americans own cars, ac, TV sets, computer the compsumtion has risen dramatically in the last 30 years. The class warfare argument I don't buy it because I can go to a government website, and see the increase per capita income. Untied States in 1920 was worse off economically than present day Mexico comparing income and compsumtion numbers. I figure gotta look at the empirical facts as it is rather than comparing CEO pay verses the burger maker at McDonald's pay. The problem is government interference in people daily lives has made poverty worse, by restrictive building codes that prohibit housing below 1000 sq ft, and preserve tax incentives that discourage savings. The heatlhcare coverage and housing costs should concern us not if a Ceo makes 20000 times more than person B. Were better off 2006 than in 1970, and people are emotionally person worse because of the rise of the nanny state, and the media of how society really is.

2006-12-08 17:08:44 · answer #2 · answered by ram456456 5 · 0 1

Hey, isn't that the system used in North Korea by President Kim Jong Il and the little guy Pyongyang . He takes all the money and decides who gets what.... Its called a socialist society,you know government ownership,like what the Democrats are imposing...
No thanks..

2006-12-08 17:00:44 · answer #3 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0 1

Socialism doesn't work.

2006-12-08 16:54:58 · answer #4 · answered by only p 6 · 1 1

Because they are gay and lazy.

2006-12-08 16:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by Kyle C 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers