Fantasy Football: Garcia, Rivers, or Kitna?

Question

I have Jon Kitna vs. Vikings, Jeff Garcia vs. 'Skins, or Philip Rivers vs. Broncos. This is a playoff game so who should I start? Please Help!

Answer 1

Garcia. The Redskins have been very kind to opposing QBs this year. The Broncos and Vikings not so much.

In the last three games, Garcia has 6 TDs and 0 INTs. Rivers has 6 TDs and 3 INTs in his last four, and Kitna has 3 TDs and 6 INTs in his last four.

Answer 2

Garcia vs Washington

Answer 3

Jeff Garcia

Answer 4

Not Rivers, Denver D is too strong. I'd go with Garcia. He has something to prove, as opposed to Kitna.

Answer 5

Kitna will be picked twice Garcia will only dump it off i.e. westbrook go with Rivers he will torch the Broncos

Answer 6

Wow. i'm no longer able to believe all of us is heavily asserting it relatively is a foul group. you're stacked with expertise. Bulger is impressive, and the offense has been upgraded with the additions of a TE (Randy McMichael) and a good #3 WR (Drew Bennett). And he's no longer getting older. he's in basic terms 30, it relatively is youthful than Peyton, and with the help of no skill too previous for a QB. Jackson is very very nearly the consensus #2 RB in the back of LT, and actual ought to surpass him in production this year. Maroney is mildly worrisome because of fact of injuries, and inexperience. yet he's the commencing back on between the terrific communities interior the league, and Brady's presence will save the D uncomplicated. Chad Johnson is in basic terms impressive. possibly a sprint inconsistent, yet nevertheless between the right 3 WRs interior the interest. driving force is effective, solid (he performs via injuries) and is the only genuine recieving selection in green Bay. Coles isnt the terrific WR, besides the shown fact that, he has Cotchery opposite him to maintain stress off, and is a possible #2 WR. impressive value because of fact the #3 guy on your group. this could be a brakout year for Vernon Davis. He in straightforward terms performed in 8 video games final year and nevertheless had 265 yds. and 3 TDs. With a year below his belt and playing at finished capability, you may assume approximately 750 yds, and 7 TDs, which places him in as a appropriate 5 TE. Wilkins replaced into stable final year, and no reason he can't be stable back this year. whether he isnt who cares? a good Kicker will consistently be availble on the waiver. The Steelers D has declined these days yet continues to be lots valuable, and a appropriate 10 D. i don't know who your back-united statesare, yet your starters are super. the only genuine concern you will possibly desire to have is that your QB and #a million RB have the comparable byeweek. I supply your group a stable A, even in line with probability an A+. assume to play on your league's Championship interest. stable success!

Answer 7

I would say Garcia because he has been being very productive lately after filling in for McNabb. He has thrown 6 touchdowns in his last four games and i think he'll light up the redskins secondary as well

Answer 8

Garcia

i think his gonna keep playing better otherwise no one will pay him to be on there team,plus Garcia has HAS to win

Answer 9

I asked Eli and he said he'd start Philip Rivers. ;)

Answer 10

OMG....GET A F*CKING LIFE AND STOP PLAYING FANTASY FOOTBALL

WHILE YOU ARE OUT PLAYING WITH YOUR FRIENDS D*CKS I AM STICKING MINE IN YOUR WIFE. IF YOU STOP PLAYING THAT *****TY SH*T I WOULDN'T HAVE TO WORK SO HARD KEEPING YOUR WOMEN HAPPY.

GET A F*CKING LIFE LOSERS